GB balancing for 4.87

Hi there Guest,

Existing user? Create account

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Reduce firepower or agility? You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Firepower	44.68%	21	44.68%
Agility	55.32%	26	55.32%
Total		47 vote(s)	100%

* You voted for this item.

GB balancing for 4.87

Offline

12-17-2012, 10:35 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-17-2012, 10:43 PM by Ursus.)

#41

Member

Posts: 3,853
Threads: 249
Joined: Oct 2011

Yeah nerfing dps to 50% sounds like the worst option of the lot. NOBODY will use them for anything, so just delete them instead and get it over with. Will Basics be destroyed too? I assume so or else everybody will just use those instead of house turrets. What about Solaris? They are essentially the same DPS as basics and some of the lower house turrets--2700 for Solaris vs 2800 for Basics--with only slight increase in power usage. If the Sollies arent nerfed then everybody will use those since they are the same power as basics. If they ARE nerfed then gunboats become completely useless against snubs. Not to mention this really screws over Rheinland and Bretonia and the other factions that depend on very-high-damage turrets to balance for size and/or arcs. Worst option of the lot.

Discovery 24/7 Negotiating Tactics:

[Image: smuggler-threat-0-1.jpg]

[Image: smuggler-threat-0-1.jpg]

Reply

Messages In This Thread

GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-15-2012, 05:17 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Stealthsultn - 12-15-2012, 05:22 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ichiru - 12-15-2012, 05:45 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ascalon - 12-15-2012, 05:56 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 06:01 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-15-2012, 10:30 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by bloogaL - 12-15-2012, 10:38 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:02 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by aerelm - 12-18-2012, 12:27 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by jonfreelanc - 12-15-2012, 06:38 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JayDee Kasane - 12-15-2012, 06:47 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-15-2012, 07:23 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-15-2012, 07:29 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 11:10 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-15-2012, 11:18 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:21 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Giorgio - 12-15-2012, 11:22 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 11:22 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jack_Henderson - 12-15-2012, 11:45 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:57 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 12:07 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Vrabcek - 12-15-2012, 01:42 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jansen - 12-15-2012, 03:17 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by TonyRistar - 12-15-2012, 03:44 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-15-2012, 05:04 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Knjaz - 12-15-2012, 06:16 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 12-15-2012, 03:47 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Pavel - 12-15-2012, 04:14 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Vrabcek - 12-15-2012, 04:26 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Charos - 12-15-2012, 04:17 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Pavel - 12-15-2012, 06:33 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Sava - 12-15-2012, 07:25 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Blodo - 12-15-2012, 07:37 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jansen - 12-17-2012, 09:43 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-17-2012, 10:30 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Redon - 12-15-2012, 09:47 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Govedo13 - 12-16-2012, 02:29 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by TonyRistar - 12-16-2012, 05:14 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-16-2012, 06:17 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 12-16-2012, 06:32 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-17-2012, 06:35 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-17-2012, 10:35 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JIVA - 12-17-2012, 10:41 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-17-2012, 10:52 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JIVA - 12-17-2012, 10:56 PM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-18-2012, 01:43 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 12:03 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Stealthsultn - 12-18-2012, 12:10 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Omicron - 12-18-2012, 12:56 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 02:22 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-18-2012, 02:25 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 02:29 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-18-2012, 04:43 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Knjaz - 12-18-2012, 11:29 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by monmarfori - 01-02-2013, 05:13 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 01-02-2013, 06:14 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Tabris - 01-02-2013, 06:26 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jack_Henderson - 01-02-2013, 09:56 AM

RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Zynth - 01-02-2013, 10:33 AM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)