• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 165 166 167 168 169 … 547 Next »
GB balancing for 4.87

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Reduce firepower or agility?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Firepower
44.68%
21 44.68%
Agility
55.32%
26 55.32%
Total 47 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

GB balancing for 4.87
Offline JIVA
12-17-2012, 10:41 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-17-2012, 10:45 PM by JIVA.)
#42
Member
Posts: 380
Threads: 19
Joined: Jan 2008

lets just assume that what people wrote here to be true for a second.

- what they said is that gunboats with TS and TZ require "no skill" - and are practicly "i-win-ships" vs. snubs

lets then cut the dps they do in half - provided they will still defeat the regeneration rate of snub shields, which they will.... (easily even with 50% dps )


so if what people SAID was TRUE - then all it will do it give the snubs around twice the time to survive until the inevitable death, cause it does not change the "in-win" ship - it just increases the duration of their demise.



of course only - if people stated the truth

also - naturally, other sustained damage guns would be adjusted, too - otherwise, whats the point.

[Image: JIVA_Sig_zps4e7f97f1.png]
the [JIVA] group
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-15-2012, 05:17 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Stealthsultn - 12-15-2012, 05:22 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ichiru - 12-15-2012, 05:45 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ascalon - 12-15-2012, 05:56 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 06:01 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-15-2012, 10:30 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by bloogaL - 12-15-2012, 10:38 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:02 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by aerelm - 12-18-2012, 12:27 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by jonfreelanc - 12-15-2012, 06:38 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JayDee Kasane - 12-15-2012, 06:47 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-15-2012, 07:23 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-15-2012, 07:29 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 11:10 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-15-2012, 11:18 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:21 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Giorgio - 12-15-2012, 11:22 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 11:22 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jack_Henderson - 12-15-2012, 11:45 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-15-2012, 11:57 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Remilia Scarlet - 12-15-2012, 12:07 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Vrabcek - 12-15-2012, 01:42 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jansen - 12-15-2012, 03:17 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by TonyRistar - 12-15-2012, 03:44 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-15-2012, 05:04 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Knjaz - 12-15-2012, 06:16 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 12-15-2012, 03:47 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Pavel - 12-15-2012, 04:14 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Vrabcek - 12-15-2012, 04:26 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Charos - 12-15-2012, 04:17 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Pavel - 12-15-2012, 06:33 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Sava - 12-15-2012, 07:25 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Blodo - 12-15-2012, 07:37 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jansen - 12-17-2012, 09:43 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-17-2012, 10:30 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Redon - 12-15-2012, 09:47 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Govedo13 - 12-16-2012, 02:29 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by TonyRistar - 12-16-2012, 05:14 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Swallow - 12-16-2012, 06:17 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 12-16-2012, 06:32 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-17-2012, 06:35 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-17-2012, 10:35 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JIVA - 12-17-2012, 10:41 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-17-2012, 10:52 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by JIVA - 12-17-2012, 10:56 PM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-18-2012, 01:43 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 12:03 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Stealthsultn - 12-18-2012, 12:10 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Omicron - 12-18-2012, 12:56 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 02:22 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Ursus - 12-18-2012, 02:25 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 02:29 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Hone - 12-18-2012, 04:43 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Knjaz - 12-18-2012, 11:29 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by monmarfori - 01-02-2013, 05:13 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by SummerMcLovin - 01-02-2013, 06:14 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Tabris - 01-02-2013, 06:26 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Jack_Henderson - 01-02-2013, 09:56 AM
RE: GB balancing for 4.87 - by Zynth - 01-02-2013, 10:33 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode