• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 196 197 198 199 200 … 779 Next »
heavy electro-magnetic disruptor

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Do we need electro-magnetic cloak disruptors?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
YES!
47.83%
11 47.83%
No.
47.83%
11 47.83%
Dont know.
4.35%
1 4.35%
Total 23 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

heavy electro-magnetic disruptor
Offline Reptile
12-18-2012, 04:05 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-18-2012, 04:21 AM by Reptile.)
#8
Typical russian lolwut
Posts: 306
Threads: 32
Joined: Nov 2012

Ok,so my proposition:
Cruisers: heavy electro-magnetic missile,which i wrote before which will turn-off all types of cloak engines.Slow and powerfull,fighter can easily run from her.
Gunboats: light electro-magnetic missiles,which will turn-off only light cloaks,maybe medium,but NOT ONLY heavy.BS will easy cloak,GB will not stop them.But fighters\bombers will be in trouble if this type of GB will be near.
Bombers: electro-magnetic torpedo-disruptor, will eat cargohold (weapon or ammo), slow, bad range (near 1750 m), will eat more than nova energy (in 1.3 - 1.5 times).

This will works against jump drives too.They will stop them.I think this is optimal position.
____________________________________________________________

For stopping fighters with cloaks == > fighter wing need anticloak GB.
For stopping heavy ships, GBs\fighters wings ===> need bombers with heavy electro-magnetic torpedo.
For more percent of stopping many cloaking ships ===> fleet need Anticloak cruisers with their heavy electro-magnetic missiles.

This will balance team play and will not do some of units OP.
Everyone need other type of units in their wing.

GB will be good against little targets such as fighters\bombers\GB and maybe cruisers (need to think about it).Their antisnub role will work perfectly.Aka "light electro-magnetic missile" for fighters and bombers.
Bombers will good against caps,bad against GB,fighters other bombers.Torpedo not so fast moving.
Cruisers will be good against BS and cruisers,and weak against snubs with cloaks.Big slow missile,and fighter will easily will run from it.

So every units with cloak has his anti-unit.Al in balance,need only write their parameters.For sure.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
What we will have in the end?

Light anticloak patrol:
GB with light anticloak + fighters ===== will care light and medium targets,such as fighters,bombers,GBs,for heavy targets need anticloak bombers\cruisers heavy wing.

Medium anticloak patrol:

Fighters + GBs with light anticloak + bombers with heavy anticloak torpedoes. Will care light and big targets,but they will have power only stop them,not for normal fight.If there is an enemy fleet - they need more powerful units,such as cruiser.

Heavy anticloak patrol:
Fighters + GB with light anticloak + cruiser with heavy anticloak missile. They will stop all type of units and will have firepower to shot them down.

Fleet wing:
Fighters + gb with light antcloak + bombers with anticloak torpedoes + cruisers with heavy anticloak missiles + BS wing = powerful fleet which will get all type of units even if they will all has cloaks,and will have power to eliminate them all.

Wrote:
~Please leave this community, please. You'd be doing everyone a favour.
~Nikita. Please. Go play sims.
~Nikita, stop acting like that... you are just embarrassing yourself.
~Your way to win may be within rules, but you still break Rule 0.0 be excellent to eachother.
~but please just keep it to the Russian Discord chats and off the forums. We're tired of reading it.

then you will see 70 players online in this way. -me
2012©
RNC|MND-Gepard
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Reptile - 12-18-2012, 12:17 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 12:32 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Hone - 12-18-2012, 12:40 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Reptile - 12-18-2012, 12:42 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 02:27 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Reptile - 12-18-2012, 03:38 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 03:53 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Reptile - 12-18-2012, 04:05 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by SummerMcLovin - 12-18-2012, 04:10 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Reptile - 12-18-2012, 04:28 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 05:08 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by SummerMcLovin - 12-18-2012, 05:55 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by JayDee Kasane - 12-18-2012, 06:19 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by DelBoy - 12-18-2012, 07:06 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by why_so_serious - 12-18-2012, 09:02 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Hone - 12-18-2012, 09:28 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Lonely_Ghost - 12-18-2012, 09:22 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Lonely_Ghost - 12-18-2012, 09:40 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by why_so_serious - 12-18-2012, 09:50 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by monmarfori - 12-18-2012, 10:01 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Ichiru - 12-18-2012, 10:33 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Veygaar - 12-18-2012, 10:33 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Xelon - 12-18-2012, 10:40 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Knjaz - 12-18-2012, 11:06 AM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by AeternusDoleo - 12-18-2012, 12:30 PM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Reptile - 12-18-2012, 02:40 PM
RE: heavy electro-magnetic disruptor - by Lonely_Ghost - 12-18-2012, 06:50 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode