The Hobbit

[Makc_RU]

Jihad, you have to look at it from another perspective. Imagine how good of imagination you need to have to make a movie out of the book? Books are always better because:
- We use our own imagine when reading them, thus not relying on director's point of view
- It is hard to put a lot of details that books have into a movie

I think you work with visual effects, if my memory is correct. Imagine if you are invited to a major party event, 20-50 DJ, you work your ass off on lightning, laser shows, fogs,etc and an idiot like me comes in at says: I think everything sucked, lasers must die, lightnings was terrible, etc, etc and the critic himself/herself does not know jack about how to set it up. That is what bothered me and why I wrote such a straight forward response.

I strongly think that instead of saying the movie sucked and should be cut, or whatnot, why not say: Well, the first part seemed boring to me and in my opinion it should've had more action and less lore.

---

User was banned for: banned pending staff discussions
Time left: (Permanent)