Confused/need answers

[Markus_Janus]

Am I the only one that found it hilarious when the KSP guy earlier talked about 'skype chats' like they themselves constituted roleplay. Skype agreements=/=roleplay. This base was a badly informed decision, at least have the balls to admit that.

Wow just wow.
Not sure how you made that connection and thought it was logical but, good show old chap!

Ryoken, I understand how a base in front of a capital planet can be a source for irritation.
But the thing is that whether you feel it is InRP or OoRP is only part of the equasion, it also matters if other feel whether it is InRP or not.

The thing with this base I find most amusing is that no one has attempted any RP with that base's owners in the slightest.
Instead everything has been attempted as a rant on the forums, this will not work.
The base the way it is has it's political weaknesses to exploit, not just at the owners but more importantly the government that lets it happen.
But we must make a choice, either play with the base or not, you have stated you have calmed down and chose not to play with it, problem solved, go have fun.

Now everyone here has to make the same choice, to play or not to play.
Either way ranting on forums or suggesting admin intervention is a bit silly when this is a RP server, doesn't mean you have to like others RP, just means you have to try to RP yourself.


WHen it comes to this thread in particular, the only question is, should a base be allowed to be built in the vacinity of another structure in space.
If the answer is no, then a lot of bases will have to be remade.
If the answer is yes, then it must come down to RP actions to determine which ones are acceptable and which ones are not.

---

Samura Omotai Zaibatsu.