Reducing pvp death consequences to avoid ''gank'' rants.

[AshHill07]

I say put in shiploss on death (with balances such as cheaper stuff, ships more easily available, all equipment available everywhere ect.) And remove time out entirely.

I can tell you know, ship loss on death will do the opposite. People will rage even more that they got gank killed, because there was little they could do about it.

That said, battleships in thier current state can't run from overwhelming odds unless they get lucky with a cloak. Countermeasures on battleships are pointless since theres pretty much a 0% success rate against CD's, and even if you do manage to survive long enough to cloak, whos to say someone won't just use the missile tracking bug to keep yo CD'd until you come out of it.

Bringing up anouther scenario, how long before traders bring up the QQ about being killed by bombers/cruisers demanding stupid amounts, which will definatly increase since some people are just trolls and will want people to loose thier ships.

I'm sure others can think up many other reasons why its also a terrible idea.

---

\\ CDR David Roberts \\ CAPT Steven Eversman \\ VADM Ash Hill // RDML Chris Murray // CDR Mick Connors //
\\ SFC| Patrol-7 \\ SFC| LNS-California \\ SFC| LNT-Century // SFC| LNS-San.Francisco // SFC| Patrol-5 //