Universal Shipping Incorporated

[US|]

I was on a Rogue ship, fighting a FL ID'ed 5k full of Artifacts, when one of your fighters came by and started shooting me without a word.

http://s1.directupload.net/images/130526/bxhj2drk.jpg

http://s1.directupload.net/images/130526/ealzpfq9.jpg

I hope this is a single case.

Well I looked your 'evidence' over.

13k [*USI*]J.Sparrow[CA]
your shields 100%
you clearly engaged in some hostile action against Torben.Spirit
you start off some ooc chat in local and he follows suit and continues in private

and your moaning about him silent engaging.

realy

Your ignoring the fact that the USI guy admitted he didnt talk, just because the Rog also acted inappropriately. Not to mention the USI apparently uing PM to berate the rogue for calling him out on it?

And a FL ID 5k, thats against the rules no? What is USI doing defending cheaters? Really responding to feedback rudely just because its negative is not good.

Thank you for taking an interest.
As you may have noticed we are taking action on the alledged incident.
I am ignoring nothing. He clearly stated he did not care to talk to enemies, but that is quite different to opponent. And as there is absolutely no evidence of an engagement, as i pointed out, i can only try to investigate the absence of coversation in the accuseds logs, which is a frankly pointless exercise.
That there is no clear evidence of the location does not help matters (though i get the impression this is Manhatan orbit) and could be salient to the circumstances and behaviour.
"Torben.Spirit: Stop bumoing me
Armed.Flatfish: No"
Is indication of a typical anti-docking technique being used, which leaves sufficient room for doubt that it may have been trying to dock Trenton Outpost. Which would have warranted an attack by Mr Sparrow, even a silent one, against a Rouge performing such an act there. The artifacts carried by Toben.Spirit would and should have been a secondary concern and then only to report it to Liberty officials. That it is a Freelancer in a 5ker is not his problem or USIs and is totally besides the point in this context.
I did point out that neither party behaved properly in conversation. That is something i can/have acted on, as the evidence is clear, though it was not mentioned in the report.
As for my attitude. As i found none of the presented 'evidence' substantiated the claim, and ignored what i felt was a more serious breach of conduct, i viewed it as a hostile post rather than sincere one. I should have been more polite and i apologise for my poor manners there. But, i do find that there is a steady undercurrent of disrespect for USI and its members. That isn't to say that there, has been/are not, many with failings. They are mostly new to Discovery and its concepts. We at least are willing to give anyone a chance and the assistance to improve, within our means. If you feel we are not up to that task then feel free to come and bless us with your experience. Our doors are open

---