Abuse of Power Complaint to Admins Via Bretonian War Cabinet/BAF

[Jinx]

a few things to consider


- roleplay is not ooc. roleplay is at its best when it is agreed on from both sides on a ooc basis. - roleplay is stageplay... but when roleplay is only unilateral it starts to mix with ooc. - so why not trust each other to work out a plot

- a good mantra is always the classic that you must not treat others in a way you would not like to be treated yourself. if the players involved agree that they would have enjoyed the outcome - NO MATTER what role in that all they occupy - they can at least live with their own conscience.

- classic inRP consequences are "comply or die" - we have no other tools. - the police cannot incarcerate an offender or lock them down for X hours.

that works very well in terms of ships.
- ships are a "one-time-investment"
- ships do not use money to be maintained
- ships are significantly cheaper than pobs
- most importantly ... ships respawn when they die
- ships / players can always offer a compromise to avoid combat situationally

it does not work well with pobs.
- pobs are a progressive investment
- pobs require money to be maintained
- pobs are significantly more expensive than ships
- and most importantly .... pobs do not resawn when they die
- pobs cannot offer an agreement, cause they are "stupid" - only when the owners ore representatives are ACTIVLY around, they an offer a compromise

the differences - especially regarding pvp - is huge. and so the old classic "comply or die" so called "inRP" consequence may not apply too well.

we seem to have two very different stances now. in case of itabashi - the goverment was a bit slow and the base was a bit over aggressive. in case of this base - the goverment was a bit fast and the base appeared not to have been overaggressive - but presumed to be a danger to become that ( pre-emptive strike )



in my opinion - PoBs are unlike playerships. there should be a RULE that demands that the owner

- should not be forced to share the password with someone he does not fully trust

inRP a faction can demand a password - but the base owner should also "inRP" be allowed to give a FAKE password - that is treated like a real one. when the faction wants to USE that password - they would need to contact the base owner with their intent. - hence forcing multilateral roleplay or forcing a compromise. the fake password should be treated like the real one inRP - but enabling the base owner to "have changed the password upon noticing the malivious attempt of the other party" - that would flag the base effectivly hostile to those who realize that they were given a "now invalid password" - so they can siege the base ... but not from within but from the outside.

it may be logical to demand a pw inRP - but we are dealing with conditions that are FAR different from normal pvp.

---

Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC