Abuse of Power Complaint to Admins Via Bretonian War Cabinet/BAF

[Marcus]

The Station was acctualy defined as an BHG Installation and since the inRP Agreement of this just Summer on Skype and me talked ooRPly. It was something like ''It would be better if you hold it to BPA becuz the repsheet you know...''

This doesn't change anything. You were asked to keep the IFF as BPA, not on a whim but for some very good reasons, to which you agreed to keep it as BPA. Suddenly changing it without warning, while not in itself deserves the destruction of the base, was apart of a series of events that caused a lack of trust.

As for the next two sections, from what I gather you're saying that on 4 separate occasions when you were; Organizing the docking list permissions, Summer JUST happened to want to dock at that time, and when you were testing the weapon platforms (for which I still don't understand why you felt that you HAD to use your BHG) that over a period of a few days for the three times which you changed the settings that a ship JUST happened to be passing through? At times, by your own admission, when the server count was low. And not three separate ships but the same ship twice? The probability of such seems a little far fetched. A quick search brings a quote which conveys my opinion on the matter: "Once is an accident. Twice is coincidence. Three times is an enemy action."

As for your Jokes...it can be hard to know when people are being serious or not when you're just looking at text. Alone it might've seen the be a joke and left alone but combined with the other actions it seems much more threatening. While Skype is oorp what is said there does reflect on a persons character and intent, Discovery isn't just about purely what can be proved in comm posts and screen shots, it's also about trust. If you don't trust someone, for whatever reason, then no matter how nicely they present their case or reason their argument you still might not believe them.

---