• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 … 33 34 35 36 37 … 198 Next »
Is this breaking rule 5.8?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Is this breaking rule 5.8?
Offline Trail
06-30-2013, 10:50 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-30-2013, 10:53 PM by Trail.)
#14
Member
Posts: 347
Threads: 21
Joined: Dec 2011

(06-30-2013, 10:46 PM)Trail Wrote:
(06-30-2013, 11:57 AM)bloogaL Wrote:
(06-30-2013, 11:08 AM)Trail Wrote: To clarify C broke rule 5.8

C is aware who B is and is not allowed to engage that character (and vice versa)

That said since B is not aware of who C is he would not be breaking a rule if he engaged first unless C told B in advance on who he was. Of course if B does know who C is then they are both maliciously breaking 5.8 if they decided to fight anyway.

Nothing in the rules says C can't attack B, nor that B can't attack C. The player behind A and C is on a different character to the one he killed B on in the first place, so B is free to engage him. Where you got the idea that C can't engage B I have no idea.

Admin confirmation:
(03-04-2013, 09:46 PM)Gheis Wrote:
  • Scenario 2: I, LHI|Gheis.Mace, kill LR-Contrived.Name in California. I then, before the two hours are up, switch to OSI-Resolute captained InRP by Gheis Mace, and am engaged by LR-Contrived.Name in a separate interaction. Because the ship names are not notably similar (LHI|Gheis.Mace v OSI-Resolute), I cannot expect LR-Contrived.Name to have known I was the same person - or even the same character - and so no violation of reengagement has occurred. Because I'm notably different as well, LR-Contrived.Name can assume I've logged off and return to California if he so wishes.

the scenario you describe is different from the one in the OP. since while the now victim that is being attacked knows the person who was killed before. The killed doesnt know the victim. The victim is also not the one engaging the person who he killed before.

Quote: I cannot expect LR-Contrived.Name to have known I was the same person

He even says so.

meanwhile in the original scenario by monmarfori the person who engages B knows that he was taken out by him before.

(06-30-2013, 12:22 PM)monmarfori Wrote: So that means I can get on my Sair to hunt some hessians; including some who were killed on my RM char. Thanks!

No it doesn't. If you engage someone you killed or got killed by before then you are willfully re-engaging someone on a different account/character and that is sanctionable should the person you killed report you.


edit: blah sorry for the double post wasnt able to delete this post either

Quote:Well actually, no need to even switch to Sair. If you kill a hessian with your RM, you could follow the hessian about and continue to attack him again with your RM technically. However, obviously, that is rather poor form.

this is re-engaging

Quote:A player who was killed in a PvP fight must not attack the enemy (character or characters involved in the death) with any of the characters on his/her account(s) for 2 hours.

[Image: xbabs0.jpg]
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by monmarfori - 06-29-2013, 05:55 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Jaika - 06-29-2013, 06:17 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Syf - 06-29-2013, 06:28 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Draconyx - 06-29-2013, 07:20 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Hone - 06-30-2013, 01:28 AM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Divine - 06-30-2013, 01:47 AM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Hone - 06-30-2013, 01:54 AM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Trail - 06-30-2013, 11:08 AM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by bloogaL - 06-30-2013, 11:57 AM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by monmarfori - 06-30-2013, 12:22 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Lonely Werewolf - 06-30-2013, 12:41 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Trail - 06-30-2013, 10:46 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Trail - 06-30-2013, 10:50 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by belarusich - 06-30-2013, 10:47 AM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Hone - 06-30-2013, 11:03 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by bloogaL - 06-30-2013, 11:04 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Trail - 06-30-2013, 11:16 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Hone - 06-30-2013, 11:21 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Agmen of Eladesor - 07-01-2013, 04:44 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode