• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 … 33 34 35 36 37 … 198 Next »
Is this breaking rule 5.8?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Is this breaking rule 5.8?
Offline Trail
06-30-2013, 11:16 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-30-2013, 11:21 PM by Trail.)
#17
Member
Posts: 347
Threads: 21
Joined: Dec 2011

(06-30-2013, 11:03 PM)Hone Wrote: Trail you shouldnt mock people for not knowing the rules, when they do, and you obviously dont yourself. They guy who WINS the fight is allowed to keep attacking the loser in new systems. 5.8 says, a player who was KILLED in a pvp fight cant re-engage, not the guy who WON.

killing the same guy over and over on the same character if not covered by 5.8 is then still covered by 1.2

Quote:The rule only covers re-engaging the character you were killed by, not the player, even if you know the separate character is the same player.

I killed a transport once in Nagano. I ran to tohoku where I was engaged by two eagles. They might not have been the same character ICly but oocly it was the same player (the guy even admitted to it) I sent in a report and the person got sanctioned. The defense of 'different character' applies to the player. It wouldn't be hard to create several differently named ships just for the purposes of re-engaging in different systems. (although 1.2 could come into play)

[Image: xbabs0.jpg]
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by monmarfori - 06-29-2013, 05:55 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Jaika - 06-29-2013, 06:17 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Syf - 06-29-2013, 06:28 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Draconyx - 06-29-2013, 07:20 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Hone - 06-30-2013, 01:28 AM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Divine - 06-30-2013, 01:47 AM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Hone - 06-30-2013, 01:54 AM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Trail - 06-30-2013, 11:08 AM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by bloogaL - 06-30-2013, 11:57 AM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by monmarfori - 06-30-2013, 12:22 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Lonely Werewolf - 06-30-2013, 12:41 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Trail - 06-30-2013, 10:46 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Trail - 06-30-2013, 10:50 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by belarusich - 06-30-2013, 10:47 AM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Hone - 06-30-2013, 11:03 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by bloogaL - 06-30-2013, 11:04 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Trail - 06-30-2013, 11:16 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Hone - 06-30-2013, 11:21 PM
RE: Is this breaking rule 5.8? - by Agmen of Eladesor - 07-01-2013, 04:44 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode