Siege Ship Idea...[well the [Resurrection of the idea]

Hi there Guest,

Existing user? Create account

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: What do you think of this idea? (multi choice) You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes this sounds good. But may need work	31.43%	11	31.43%
It will have to be thought over throughly and needs work.	28.57%	10	28.57%
This idea could cause too many issues ingame, No. or leaning towards no	40.00%	14	40.00%
Total		35 vote(s)	100%

* You voted for this item.

Siege Ship Idea...[well the [Resurrection of the idea]

Offline

07-17-2013, 02:03 PM,

#4

Member

Posts: 143
Threads: 8
Joined: Apr 2013

However, we currently have an uncountable problem.

Base defence of large core threes and fours can be done by just a few oppertunistic transports at low activity times. an hour of supplying properly can require eons of sieging to deplete, from a vast number of high-grade caps. Not only is the ridiculous capspam required difficult to Rp, it causes rage-inducing lag and bores everyone involved. The defenders merely need to wait for one little opening in the shield and hey presto; full regens. Any half-measures, such as No-Fly-Zones, result in enormous QQ and Oorp TBF of InRp actions.

The artillery ship concept is the best possible counter to this there could ever be.

Does it seem right to you that one unarmed transport can defend a base more successfully than a mixed taskforce of caps and snubs?

Reply

Messages In This Thread

Siege Ship Idea...[well the [Resurrection of the idea] - by Echelon - 07-17-2013, 01:27 PM

RE: Idea [Siege Ship] - by Jinx - 07-17-2013, 01:55 PM

RE: Idea [Siege Ship] - by Gulryz - 07-17-2013, 02:07 PM

RE: Idea [Siege Ship] - by Echelon - 07-17-2013, 02:14 PM

RE: Idea [Siege Ship] - by Echelon - 07-17-2013, 02:00 PM

RE: Idea [Siege Ship] - by Di'taraAlpha - 07-17-2013, 02:03 PM

RE: Idea [Siege Ship] - by Echelon - 07-17-2013, 04:27 PM

RE: Idea [Siege Ship] - by Jinx - 07-17-2013, 02:05 PM

RE: Idea [Siege Ship] - by Echelon - 07-17-2013, 02:10 PM

RE: Idea [Siege Ship] - by Echelon - 07-17-2013, 02:40 PM

RE: Idea [Siege Ship] - by Duvelske - 07-17-2013, 02:10 PM

RE: Idea [Siege Ship] - by massdriver - 07-17-2013, 04:10 PM

RE: Idea [Siege Ship] - by Echelon - 07-17-2013, 04:17 PM

RE: Idea [Siege Ship] - by massdriver - 07-17-2013, 04:20 PM

RE: Idea [Siege Ship] - by belarusich - 07-17-2013, 04:42 PM

RE: Idea [Siege Ship] - by Echelon - 07-17-2013, 04:48 PM

RE: Idea [Siege Ship] - by hydrolux - 07-17-2013, 04:58 PM

RE: Siege Ship Idea...[well the reserection of the idea] - by Echelon - 07-17-2013, 05:02 PM

RE: Idea [Siege Ship] - by belarusich - 07-17-2013, 05:01 PM

RE: Siege Ship Idea...[well the reserection of the idea] - by Durandal - 07-17-2013, 07:18 PM

RE: Siege Ship Idea...[well the reserection of the idea] - by SkyNet - 07-17-2013, 08:13 PM

RE: Siege Ship Idea...[well the reserection of the idea] - by Echelon - 07-17-2013, 08:22 PM

RE: Siege Ship Idea...[well the reserection of the idea] - by Nexus Ark - 07-17-2013, 07:58 PM

RE: Siege Ship Idea...[well the reserection of the idea] - by Croft - 07-17-2013, 11:19 PM

RE: Siege Ship Idea...[well the [Resurrection of the idea] - by hydrolux - 07-18-2013, 12:28 AM

RE: Siege Ship Idea...[well the [Resurrection of the idea] - by Echelon - 07-18-2013, 04:31 AM

RE: Siege Ship Idea...[well the [Resurrection of the idea] - by tothebonezone - 07-18-2013, 04:55 AM

RE: Siege Ship Idea...[well the [Resurrection of the idea] - by Echelon - 07-18-2013, 05:03 AM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)