Critique: The disco diplomacy system

[Stolt.]

As you might have guessed, i disagree - while black and white are extremes gray areas are areas you have to maneuver with finesse, not sledgehammers.

Stolt: I have no idea what you mean by this analogy.

Maybe let's pick up some more "real life examples"

You were in school, representing faction A(you) ....you have a very good friend (B) who is quite the nerdy kid but you like to game and learn together(allied) -you have another friend ©, who is your drinking/partying/sports buddy and you get along great (allied).
Now the problem is while you and C get along fine and are best buddies he is quite the nerd-hater and likes to rough them up.

Stolt: Did you seriously just compare international relations between RL countries + Disco diplomacy to....

...an elementary school bully fight?

Situation A: You bud C robs some nerdy kids of their lunch money, B sees this, is not victimized but knows that guy is your best bud and robbed his best buds

Situation B: Your bud C borrows your signature baseball bat "to show that nerds some respect" and once again beats up the friends of B, he sees he is using your stuff for it, still e is not victimized

Situation C: Your dearest C does what he always does, and in terror B runs to you and asks why you don't help his friends and keep your hands idle, he can't stop C on his own

Situation D: C beats up B - B comes to complain while you are still friends with the guy who beats up him and his friends

Situation E: C uses your bat to beat up B and you run into the fight, both asking you to help

Of course the situations are more and more escalating(and small scalish compared to politics, but i think simple is already complex enough when it comes to disco). Everytime C is out for trouble against B and his friends you know it, he knows it that you know.
The question is how long will he tolerate your knowing-but-not-acting-yet-supporting. What will watchers from the outside think of your triangle?
Will it be acceptable to them that you say these are friends in different areas of your life, thus you keep them seperated and they should deal with that? Will you be able to tell that reason to B with him "understanding" it?

Generally speaking, whatever makes my enemy stronger is something i don't like- i like my enemies weak or weakening. If a friend of mine supports an enemy of mine to reach his goals that are unrelated to me- doesn't my enemy gain more options and capacities to harm me? Yes or no? Would i like that?

Think on tradeships-mercenaries-pirates on teh somali coasts again afterwards and find your grey area again.

Please read up on Neo Liberal Institutionalism. It will explain to many things regarding the current international relations system. You could also look up realist international theory, though that theory is outdated due to the decline of the use of military force (which is being replaced with economic interdependence as Joseph Nye explains in his theory, complex interdependence).

NeoLiberal Institutionalism in short is this:

o They point out that in reality, states do cooperate with one another, but they also assume anarchic international system
o They also believe in a state centric system and that power matters
o Whereas REALISTS believe we live in a ZERO-SUM world, Institutionalists believe that we live in a POSITIVE-SUM world where all parties and gain or at the least live peacefully
o Institutionalists say there is no international government but that there are international rules and that they are not perfect but that the rules generally work
o Institutions reinforce complex interdependence
o At its core according to realist theory, the states ultimate goal is self-preservation
o One must take into account the domestic politics of a country and how it affects their foreign policy as well (e.g. China has an unruly Muslim population known as the uighurs, this would mean China should not like the Muslim countries that much since their repress their own muslim population. HOWEVER, due to China needing oil, most of which it gets from Islamic countries like Iran and Sudan, China cannot hate on Islam that much since it may damage relations).

EDIT: These notes are taken from my lecture notes by Professor Joseph Kopstein from the University of Toronto, Introduction to International Relations course.

To take a Disco example, The Order is allied with the Bundschuh, but neutral with Rheinland. By your oversimplistic ideas of diplomacy which in my opinion are incorrect, The Order should have to go to war with Rheinland because they are allied with the Bundschuh, which to the Rheinland government is a terrorist organisation.

But you have to take into account that the Order only sides with the Bundschuh when operating against Nomads/Wilde, not when the Bundschuh is fighting the RM. You also have to take into account that if the RM decided to become hostile to the Order, they would have to deploy their military to fight the Order as well, which is very difficult considering they are inRP losing the war against Liberty.

Additionally, the Order and Liberty are hostile to each other. Occasionally Liberty and the Order fight each other, which is good for Rheinland since it keeps the Liberty Navy distracted from Rheinland, even if its just a little bit distracted

Rodnas, I once again restate my point that there are a million factors you have to take into account when considering both real world and Disco diplomacy. Diplomacy is a very complicated matter because it affects people greatly.

I'll also remind you that a lot of people ridicule Former President Bush when he said "You're either with us, or you're against us" shortly before invading Iraq. How'd that turn out?

---

- Dossier on Adrienne Perry