(08-22-2013, 10:35 AM)Kazinsal Wrote: Duv's case is a little flawed.
All of those factions have, as Saronsen said, some significant reason to have capital ships. What he missed was the Order having to deal with a -- guess what -- buttload of Nomad battleships to fend off. It's only logical they'd have a somewhat impressive set of capital ships.
Unless you want the Order getting roflstomped by the nomads when suddenly one day all their Osirises have turned into Sekhmets and the ensuing destruction of the Edge Worlds that ensues.
Then we really wouldn't have to worry about Zoner capital ships.
No not really, nomad bs would defend only their homes and well see it like this why does VR need an arbiter? arent there freeports enough within sirius? To fly and depart from to do your VR stuff? O wait Zoners it was.. they have more population then many would think.. but are just devided. You try to see Corsairs, outcasts and such as houses, yet they are NOT.
Order is pounded a while back by the nomads, bhg core is a subfaction of BHG. But BHG is hunting mostly bounties indeed, try to fight Order and to gain more knowledge of the nomad tech and basically hope to get inferior weapons to fight with on for example their BHG ships. (snubs) They cannot fund so much to start a complete war vs order and nomads. along with the research with it.
So for your statements all invalid.. lets us just remove all the cruisers/bs ships and lets only let houses have em. Also Kazinsal whats the difference with liberty then that if the corsairs, order and bhg core for example would lose their caps? As the open nomads may only fly till gb isnt that more raping what you guys do there? O wait its the same as liberty only with HF. Every unlawfull in liberty uses 80% of the time a bomber anyways. And with a bomber what can you do? o wait rape caps.. so your next problem is also solved.
User was banned for: Permbanned
Time left: (Permanent)
