• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 145 146 147 148 149 … 547 Next »
Intended changes with 4.87

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Intended changes with 4.87
Offline a7om
09-17-2013, 02:15 AM, (This post was last modified: 09-17-2013, 02:18 AM by a7om.)
#2
Cardamine Consigliere
Posts: 81
Threads: 16
Joined: Jul 2013

if you think of the liberty assault carrier as a carrier used in the modern world and in WW2 and such then you would know that they have ALOT of fighter defenses but not very much anti cap protection. The USS Enterprise from WW2 is a pretty good example of this from this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Enterprise_(CV-6)

if you look at its armament you can see that it has plenty of different kinds of mg's or flak guns and can carry 90 planes at any time. anit cap ships (battleships or dreadknoughts) used 14 inch (360mm) deck guns and 5 inch (127mm) deck guns to destroy other large ships while carriers supported the battleships with fighters and suppression against hostile fighters.

carriers arent anti cap ship ships. They are meant to carry fighters. IMO the liberty assault carrier is working as intended.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Intended changes with 4.87 - by BattleHammer - 09-17-2013, 02:07 AM
RE: Intended Ship Info? - by a7om - 09-17-2013, 02:15 AM
RE: Intended changes with 4.87 - by Joker - 09-17-2013, 02:20 AM
RE: Intended changes with 4.87 - by BattleHammer - 09-17-2013, 02:45 AM
RE: Intended changes with 4.87 - by AeternusDoleo - 09-17-2013, 09:10 AM
RE: Intended changes with 4.87 - by sindroms - 09-17-2013, 04:48 PM
RE: Intended changes with 4.87 - by Yber - 09-17-2013, 09:24 AM
RE: Intended changes with 4.87 - by BattleHammer - 09-17-2013, 04:17 PM
RE: Intended changes with 4.87 - by Highland Laddie - 09-17-2013, 04:30 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode