• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 145 146 147 148 149 … 547 Next »
Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback)

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback)
Offline CadaverCII
09-18-2013, 08:09 AM,
#29
Member
Posts: 28
Threads: 4
Joined: Sep 2013

(09-15-2013, 10:51 PM)Govedo13 Wrote: The topic is about the junkers in general it is not .:J:. faction topic right? Right.YELLING AT PEOPLE WITH BIG LETTERS IS PATHETIC. As single official faction the RP made by it reflects at the Junker generic RP as well- that is the reason why this thing is suited for junker RP development topic. People do have the right now to disagree with .:J:. ways and RP and to take part of the discussion about junker RP.
Yep with the 1 faction per ID rule making proper junker faction is a must. I tried that in-before the Junker piracy was nerfed:
http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=46155
Lythrilux -It could be used as backbone/basics if one wants to go that way.

Given the Failure to understand let me put things this way. I created the thread to address Junker issues not having to do with Factions, but Junkers as a whole. Ships, bases, economy, gameplay. I have gotten after both other members of .:j:. and indy junkers. In addition I have tried to stay neutral in comments from both sides. Given the fact that you guys seem content to ignore that, and instead focus on factions I suppose you don't have any complaints about any of the other issues? The reason I wrote in caps is because of the complete dis-regard for the purpose in me creating this thread. Its called frustration, created by people ignoring what the original intentions, and focus of this thread were, and are too lazy to make their own thread. Faction issues is worth of its own thread is it not? So make one. In addition I find it childish that because I am a member of .:j:. you seem to be under the impression that I represent them in some way; and therefor don't like feedback against them. I just don't really want to get involved in it. I am a member of .:j:. and have done nothing wrong in regards to indys, and go out of my way to help them the same as any Junker would do for another.

Beyond all that, alot has changed for the Junkers with the release of the new patch. I would love to hear some constructive feedback, viewpoints, and general discussion of how the Junkers currently are. I will get back with feedback as soon as I can stay connected long enough to start doing some further exploring, and testing.

[Image: d2nSEOC.png]
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by CadaverCII - 09-09-2013, 04:51 AM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by Hone - 09-09-2013, 05:08 AM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by Thexare - 09-09-2013, 05:12 AM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by Papa Oomaumau - 09-09-2013, 01:23 PM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by Hone - 09-09-2013, 05:17 AM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by CadaverCII - 09-09-2013, 05:24 AM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by sindroms - 09-09-2013, 05:25 AM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by Hone - 09-09-2013, 05:39 AM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by sindroms - 09-09-2013, 05:42 AM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by Hone - 09-09-2013, 05:44 AM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by CadaverCII - 09-09-2013, 05:45 AM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by sindroms - 09-09-2013, 06:22 AM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by CadaverCII - 09-09-2013, 06:25 AM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by Hone - 09-09-2013, 05:52 AM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by CadaverCII - 09-09-2013, 05:58 AM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by sindroms - 09-09-2013, 01:37 PM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by Papa Oomaumau - 09-09-2013, 01:47 PM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by Hone - 09-09-2013, 06:15 PM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by Lythrilux - 09-09-2013, 06:55 PM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by CadaverCII - 09-09-2013, 07:19 PM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by Papa Oomaumau - 09-09-2013, 08:10 PM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by CadaverCII - 09-09-2013, 08:27 PM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by Lythrilux - 09-09-2013, 08:38 PM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by CadaverCII - 09-09-2013, 08:59 PM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by poolboy - 09-16-2013, 12:04 PM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by Hone - 09-09-2013, 07:04 PM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by Govedo13 - 09-15-2013, 10:51 PM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by CadaverCII - 09-18-2013, 08:09 AM
RE: Junkers Overlooked (Junker Feedback) - by Lythrilux - 09-16-2013, 03:22 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode