• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 149 150 151 152 153 … 780 Next »
BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan.

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan.
Offline Lonely_Ghost
10-23-2013, 10:29 PM,
#15
Member
Posts: 1,217
Threads: 48
Joined: Nov 2010

(10-23-2013, 12:16 PM)SummerMcLovin Wrote: Lastly for ship quality, Liberty does have the most advanced because of DK research or something, while Gallia would come afterwards since it's been a big focus of their entire existence. Bretonian ships tend to be pretty old but sturdy, and most of those not in Cambridge have suffered lots of damage over the years.

Im kinda feeling lost in disco lore.

Gallia info page says (exact text):" Gallia's technology advances have focused extensively on military research, and even the most venerable of its centuries-old battleships can stand toe-to-toe with some of the modern warships employed by Sirian forces."

It means, that pre-Valor, assembled, let's say in 600's AS, can hold it own against most of ships being made in the end of 700's and early 800's AS? In same time, watching, how great is Gallia's suxes' in war, I can say, the got pre-Valors of 500's AS.

On the other hand, does Sirius even had chances against those, who has technological advantage in many centuries? They could have engines, which could throttle massive ship easely as fighter. Sheild, which could be barely penetrated, weapon, which could work on complete different principles. Im not even talking about "non shooting warfire devices" like scanner jamers, (alright, I'll say it ) CLOAKS, dunno what else... gravity beam, which could throw asteroids into enemy ships.
Would we now much our own forces in 2213 year? I doubt...

So, don't you even think, that Gallia could have complete other way and principles of fighting war? With high-end technology, would their strategy be more elegant and effective, than just stupid massive armada deployment?

May be, let's remove part, about Gallia's tech advantage, leaving part, only about numbers, so it could feat story better.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by sindroms - 10-23-2013, 08:48 AM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by FallenKnight - 10-23-2013, 09:17 AM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by Vasuv - 11-15-2013, 10:13 AM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by Timmy - 10-23-2013, 09:21 AM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by FallenKnight - 10-23-2013, 09:43 AM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by Timmy - 10-23-2013, 10:10 AM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by FallenKnight - 10-23-2013, 10:57 AM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by Eugen - 10-23-2013, 11:12 AM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by Singularity - 10-23-2013, 11:37 AM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by Eugen - 10-23-2013, 11:50 AM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by Thyrzul - 10-23-2013, 11:26 AM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by sindroms - 10-23-2013, 11:58 AM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by Sabru - 10-23-2013, 12:09 PM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by SummerMcLovin - 10-23-2013, 12:16 PM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by Lonely_Ghost - 10-23-2013, 10:29 PM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by Thyrzul - 10-23-2013, 03:20 PM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by Vigilia.Procuratio - 11-15-2013, 11:19 AM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by Thyrzul - 11-15-2013, 09:30 PM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by Xelon - 11-15-2013, 11:46 AM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by Vasuv - 11-15-2013, 07:55 PM
RE: BAF, GRN, LNS and Leeds and Magellan. - by EisenSeele - 11-15-2013, 05:54 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode