Sanction Reviews

[Jack_Henderson]

100% or they're innocent. We had to prove absolutely convincingly that the player had cheated and we had to submit our evidence to the community, otherwise nobody would have paid a blind bit of attention to our decisions.

No.
It is nearly impossible to screen 100 % and it would allow all these players who love to play at the edges and get away with it to get away with it indefinitely. That's not in the best interest of the community.

"Reasonable suspicion of someone breaking the rules" or "well-founded doubt about someone playing fairly" should be imo enough to intervene from Admin side.

This game would be a better place if more people got told earlier that what they are doing is not alright. Letting them get away with clever breaking the rules by abusing their advantage of "innocent until proven guilty" is the wrong way to go in my opinion.

---

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!