(03-04-2014, 02:31 PM)Ryummel Wrote: Spoke the one pretending to post 'feedback' in actual form of QQ.
Leave these guys play the role they want, in no way they're molesting the Congress nor exploting an ID. We House Military/Police issuing FR5 requests to problematic groups to them RPwise for a reason, genius.
My my, I see that even your knowledge of English language is improving. But broken syntax not-withstanding, from what I understand they actually are (or will be) "molesting" the Congress if it allows them to get cheap bucks from their cargo. My question remains.
How is this a Junker behavior? Why is the ship pirating that :j: trader carrying Junker ID and not a Pirate ID?
And why should an indie member of law-enforcement see them as Junkers (e.g. neutral party) when all they have of their supposed allegiance is the ID? Why shouldn't other indiee pirates throw away their ID and become pirating Junkers?
If this was a group of ex-Junkers who now live as pirates I would be totally fine with it. But they aren't.
Their pirating as per ID allows only in independent systems, not part of any of the houses. Thus that means in the wild west they indeed are pirates, but while in house space they do follow the rules, to some extent.
I could agree that pirating people with your own ID would be bad, but saying they should be pirate ID just because they mostly pirate is a bit meh. It's like saying "We don't want you to use that clause in the ID that allows you to do this, because we think you should do it with that other ID that's not ours". And like Fran pointed out - if somebody bothers to tape the piracy act I'm sure any of the house governments would be happy to FR5 them.
Also - go eat a sandwich. ;]
P.S. To post actual feedback:
Met you guys like twice or so, one of the times under fire. I'd say you look like an interesting bunch and I feel refreshed to see this kind of junkers, since they've mostly been lawful smugglers / pirate friendly traders in my eyes.
