• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 … 189 190 191 192 193 … 198 Next »
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Core Dominance - 7 / 10,000
Humanity's Defiance - 78 / 10,000
Nomad Ascendancy - 38 / 10,000
Order Mastery - 10 / 10,000

Latest activity

Thread Closed 
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9
Offline uspatriotsf
03-20-2008, 02:13 AM,
#12
Member
Posts: 695
Threads: 59
Joined: Jul 2007

' Wrote:Capital ships always die first in mass fights anyway.. So, pretty much pointless.

Oh so very true. Besides the rule did used to be if capships were involved fighters could re-engage up to three times. The rule was abused, misreported and an all out mess, hence why it was changed to "No re-engaging, no exceptions." It's not perfect, but it is better than most, if not any other alternative.

<span style="color:#FF0000"><strike>RETIRED</strike></span>
ON MY WAY OUT OF RETIREMENT

DO NOT CLICK HERE
 
Thread Closed 


Messages In This Thread
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by Blackstarr - 03-19-2008, 08:48 PM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by Eppy - 03-19-2008, 08:52 PM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by Blackstarr - 03-19-2008, 08:54 PM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by Eppy - 03-19-2008, 09:02 PM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by tfmachad - 03-19-2008, 09:10 PM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by Kambei - 03-19-2008, 09:13 PM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by Blackstarr - 03-19-2008, 09:15 PM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by Varyag - 03-20-2008, 12:49 AM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by mwerte - 03-20-2008, 12:51 AM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by chopper - 03-20-2008, 12:52 AM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by Othman - 03-20-2008, 01:01 AM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by uspatriotsf - 03-20-2008, 02:13 AM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by Dieter Schprokets - 03-20-2008, 02:26 AM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by ScornStar - 03-20-2008, 09:27 AM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by Epholl - 03-20-2008, 09:32 AM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by Jihadjoe - 03-20-2008, 03:25 PM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by pchwang - 03-20-2008, 03:49 PM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by MrCynical - 03-20-2008, 04:46 PM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by Fellow Hoodlum - 03-20-2008, 05:05 PM
Idea for amedment to rules 5.7 through 5.9 - by Othman - 03-20-2008, 05:34 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode