• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Player Requests Official Faction Requests Official Faction Creation Requests Approved Faction Creation Requests
« Previous 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next »
Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR:

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Thread Closed 
Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR:
Offline Widow
05-10-2014, 04:01 AM,
#16
Devourer of Iridium
Posts: 1,947
Threads: 280
Joined: Oct 2010

(05-10-2014, 03:34 AM)mwerte Wrote: Is the current official Rogue faction ok with you staking claim to Cassini like that? They are the ones that designed the system and got it into the mod, it'd be rather impolite to just roll up and go 'hey, this is cool, we're setting up shop'.

It is more a RP mentality the PLR: have "We are leet, and because the LR- cant, we will". We have had talks with the leader of LR- about this, and with the Colorado and north systems being PLR:'s, the rest being the LR-'s. Of course, at the end of the day we are all Rogues, and territory doesn't really matter.

It's more the 'gang turf' mentality.

Putting it simply: Yes, we work very closely with LR-.

(05-10-2014, 03:34 AM)mwerte Wrote: Not a question, but that sentence made my head hurt from the grammatical and flow problems.

Whoops. I'll try re-word it. English isn't my best suit.

(05-10-2014, 03:34 AM)mwerte Wrote: 'olol, we haz fun toys because plot!' ??

There was a bit of RP behind this, and one ship has a SRP for it, the rest of the folk know there needs to be good stuff written before they can use non-Rogue stuff. Not just "because"

(05-10-2014, 03:34 AM)mwerte Wrote: Nice.

Thanks.

(05-10-2014, 03:34 AM)mwerte Wrote: Cardi addictions are for life. Not "heroin is hard to quit" for life, "your genetic code is altered and you die if you quit" for life.

We know -.-

However, we do have one using cardimine in PLR: and there has been some good RP behind the reasoning there. Moka has always disliked it, and being so dependant on outcasts because of it. So again, there has been substantial RP done over the years when Moka was warlord in LR- and PLR:.

As far as I am aware, LR- are still into the cardimine thing, so we aren't actually ruling it out completely, and we know it is a Rogue thing. As a group of Rogues though, we follow Moka's law, as loyal followers.

(05-10-2014, 03:34 AM)mwerte Wrote: Those seem like some very static goals, what are you doing to accomplish them ingame?

Granted, that needs work. We initially thought that would be a good thing to do. But when we realized how freaking boring it is because no one goes to Cassini anymore..... We kinda came to a stand still there, and it is on our to-do list to fix up and get some direction there.

It made a lot more sense when the jump hole was actually in Galileo.

(05-10-2014, 03:34 AM)mwerte Wrote: How are foreign capships in New York the concern of a group that is focused on defending Cassini? Is this not just cheap thrills at the expense of newer players who just got capships they want to try out?

Again, very long standing RP with Moka's law. And not too different to the LN not wanting capital ships. We do occasionally operate in New York for that reason.

Why?

Well. It is all well and good operating in the north Liberty parts, but reality is they are pretty inactive. And 95% of the folk in PLR: want to interact with other players. So, we allowed them to go to New York if reports of a capital ship have been made to give them that interaction.

If the cap RPs, we are far less inclined to shoot it.


(05-10-2014, 03:34 AM)mwerte Wrote: Again, if the primary goal is to defend and cleanse Cassini, what are you doing in Shikoku?

We can't necessarily smuggle much into Cassini, we can't shoot people who aren't there, and we needed something to keep people logging and add some interest. We are more often then not looting NPCs in Shikoku, for money. And the way I see it.... If KNF and co. log to tell us to leave, activity is Kusari isn't really a bad thing. Especially if everyone enjoys it (And I believe the last time I was there during an interaction with them, pants were pirated and fight followed. Everyone enjoyed it as far as I am aware).

So, activity really.

Again, it made more sense when the Jump hole was actually in Galileo. That being moved made things a little more complicated and has essentially forced us to primarily work more South in Liberty then we actually want to.
(Keep in mind the other intention of the ZOIs was to spread out activity and not have it all in New York.)

(05-10-2014, 03:34 AM)mwerte Wrote: Overall, I didn't mind the writeup or faction, I'm just concerned about the "oh, we have magic toys because we spent money gotten from Cardamine and piracy, and we don't need the Outcasts anymore" themes in the Rogues the last few years. I'm also very concerned about the lore inaccuracies regarding Cardi. For a faction that claims to be "all about the roleplay" and "not trying to change Rogue lore", that's a lot of changes to Rogue lore.

Yeah, you are right with the changing Rogue lore thing.

BUT.

We know that the Rogues lore is as it is, and its only really the views of our group - not necessarily Rogues in general, and we don't push it onto Rogues - short of giving the ones with cardi a hard time in RP. And we are intending on, at some point, looking into whether getting our own ID may be a better way to go. As a group though, we believe different groups should be allowed to have different ideas and opinions as long as we don't cause trouble. It just adds to the roleplay rather then 'all of X faction will love you if you do Y'. It means people actually need to talk to their allies in game rather then a simple "hi" as they jump through to the next system.

What we are trying to do is pretty tricky, finding the right balance between stuff being fun for the people in the group - as well as having a good time for people who come into contact with our group.

I do realize this needs a few things changed to make it make more sense, and your points will certainly be taken into consideration while we tweak things and wording slightly.






|  Émilie D’Aramitz  |  Pita  |  Jess Doe  |  Charlotte Frank  |  Amelia Scott  |  Sophia Johnson  |  Anais D’Aramitz  |  Sam Swanson  |
Thread Closed 


Messages In This Thread
Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by Moka's Loyalists - 02-23-2014, 03:56 AM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by Jansen - 02-23-2014, 10:37 AM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by Pancakes - 02-23-2014, 01:16 PM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by Sol - 02-23-2014, 02:13 PM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by Haste - 02-23-2014, 02:17 PM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by Dida - 02-23-2014, 02:22 PM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by Sath - 02-23-2014, 02:40 PM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by Buster Commodore - 02-23-2014, 04:59 PM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by Kazinsal - 02-23-2014, 02:43 PM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by Floyd.G.Murphy - 02-23-2014, 03:16 PM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by Flash™ - 02-23-2014, 07:37 PM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by Divine - 02-23-2014, 08:18 PM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by Moka's Loyalists - 02-23-2014, 09:21 PM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by Altejago - 02-25-2014, 03:45 AM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by mwerte - 05-10-2014, 03:34 AM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by Widow - 05-10-2014, 04:01 AM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by mwerte - 05-10-2014, 09:51 PM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by SnakThree - 05-10-2014, 09:54 PM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by mwerte - 05-11-2014, 01:43 AM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by Zed26 - 05-11-2014, 02:05 AM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by Widow - 05-11-2014, 04:11 AM
RE: Padua Liberty Rogues | PLR: - by aerelm - 05-11-2014, 04:18 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode