Removal of Cerberus Turrets or Replacement?

[SnakeLancerHaven]

My thoughts (or agreements with others' ideas):

1. Make Cerb RANGE lower to compensate for its hitting power
2. Make Cerb use more energy
3. Increase range of Primaries/Secondaries to greater than Cruiser Range
4. Double the BS missile max loadout

THe problem is, it doesn't change the fact that people can insta you by uncloaking, he can just sit at your "back-yard" and after that insta kill you with those Cerbs. With simple Primaries you'd still have a chance to escape but be like horribly damaged, still it would give you this option, but with the Cerbs you have none absolute death. <- No need to nerf Cloaks just an opinion about the Cerbs, if there would be no Cerbs there is no need to nerf the Cloaks imho. Also I don't think we need more Pulse cannons... In real it's the Hull which gets damaged very quick not the shield, so don't make shields more unusuable +_+ but I'd agree to EMP Missiles, 2 Different types of Missiles, why not? Or Something like the Shock Ray (Or Ray Cannon), but well fixed lol not slow turning like the first one, finaly it'd be able to turn quick and actually deal alot of dmg, more than Razor which would make it useful. Srsly the old Shock Rays were meh, slow turning realy useless maybe fix this.

I would rather see the other cap weapons made to be more useful first. Then we can talk about what to do with Cerbs.

Eisen is right. Battleship is already weak, without talking about nerfing its one strong point.

If you've read closely it would remove Cruiser Cerbs too, how does this make the Battleships weak? It'd be for once Balanced.

---

R.I.P Tabris...
Youtube - Twitch - My old Account