Removal of Cerberus Turrets or Replacement?

[SnakeLancerHaven]

Also I don't think we need more Pulse cannons... In real it's the Hull which gets damaged very quick not the shield, so don't make shields more unusuable +_+ but I'd agree to EMP Missiles, 2 Different types of Missiles, why not? Or Something like the Shock Ray (Or Ray Cannon), but well fixed lol not slow turning like the first one, finaly it'd be able to turn quick and actually deal alot of dmg, more than Razor which would make it useful. Srsly the old Shock Rays were meh, slow turning realy useless maybe fix this.

That would be another step, to make weapons much less "multirole". Like again, we have cerbs as main antisheild and antihull. Why not to nerf SDPS for all non EMP weapons to 60-70%, but keep HDPS. Kinda...nearly same things happens with snubs, we have sheildbusters, and we have hullblasters, except full shotgun settup.
Oh, well, btw, would be nice, to add all BS + 2 Primary slots, and + 1 for Heavy

I find the idea good about reducing non EMP weapon SDPS (for those who don't know, Shield Damage Per Second) to 60 - 70%, however still doesn't change the fact that Cerberus alone as a Generic weapon is too powerful, if there would be like special y'know, Liberty Cerberus, Gallia Cerberus, Kusari Cerbs, this would be a whole different story but then I have to say there are the Primaries that already take over that part of Role so why the need for Cerberus? Let alone, the Nomads have own "Cerberus" type weapons too check http://discoverygc.com/wiki/Nomad_Turret...vy_Turret) <- Dealing 66k dmg. If the Factions would have own type of "Cerberus" Guns this would be another story (still in my honest opinion Cap Ships still die way too quick with such type of guns so I'm kinda against Cerberus). Also the idea of adding maybe 2 more Primary slot instead of the Cerbs, isn't bad either, so in fact Dreadnoughts would have 3 Heavies, while Battleships stick to 2 and Carriers to 1.

---

R.I.P Tabris...
Youtube - Twitch - My old Account