• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Welcome Help & Support
« Previous 1 … 141 142 143 144 145 … 496 Next »
What happened to Colonial BC

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

What happened to Colonial BC
Offline Mao
06-26-2014, 03:57 PM,
#13
Member
Posts: 2,680
Threads: 165
Joined: Aug 2009

(06-26-2014, 11:55 AM)Lythrilux Wrote:
(06-26-2014, 11:48 AM)Mao Wrote:
(06-26-2014, 10:45 AM)Lythrilux Wrote: because a small group of miners needs access to capital ships )))
Because they're not small at all. Because they got bases all around Sirius in real hot spots. Because they developed capital ships in cooperation with a militarized mini-house and why not use them if they have access to them.

Junkers have even deeper connections and more bases all across Sirius. Where's our battleship? )))
Same can be said for numerous other factions. Hell, even GMG is more likely to have a battleship, yet, they don't have a single cap. Not even a gunboat.
1. Running costs.
2. Too much attention from house lawful organizations. After all, the junkers are quasi-lawful.

(06-26-2014, 12:05 PM)Max Morse Wrote: You do realise the same arguement as for why the IMG needs a BC can be used against them, most IMG operations take place in rock fields, it's logical to assume that the majority of engagements IMG caps get in are in rock fields, so why not jsut have a standard cruiser, maybe even a heavier one like the RMC. Also by this same logic, since the CR fight in Magellan, the portion of Coronado not in the Barrier Cloud, and potentially Leeds, why shouldn't they have a BC?
The Colonials still hope that one day they will regain control over Tau-44 and to do that, they need to fight in the rocky Tau-23. The IMG, on the other hand can scramble GBs in asteroid areas and their BC in the open. Let's not forget that it's the player factions that set the goals and chose the toys. So, if IMG wanted to keep the BC and CR wanted a simple cruiser instead, it was their choice.

(06-26-2014, 12:05 PM)Pavel Wrote:
(06-26-2014, 11:48 AM)Mao Wrote: Because they're not small at all. Because they got bases all around Sirius in real hot spots. Because they developed capital ships in cooperation with a militarized mini-house and why not use them if they have access to them.


(...) IMG can use their BC in the open space of Dublin, Magelan and Omegas.

I must've missed all of that, especially the part about IMG not being small at all.
Please, tell me more [Image: emoticon-00126-nerd.png]

Also, Lyth's right.
caps for junkers!
IMG is kinda like GMG in my books. Both corps cut their ties to the houses they appeared in, becoming "independent". Only a big entity with strong connections and good income can survive on its own on the legal market.

The junker GB is already too much, if you ask me. The junker fleet should be composed from all kinds of retrofitted transports and freighters and a few cheap fighters and bombers. Not capital grade ships. And that Wrecker is ugly and doesn't fit the junkers at all. The engines also burn the lower "arms". The model is bad.

[Image: ZZ0gBOD.png]
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
What happened to Colonial BC - by SnakeLancerHaven - 06-26-2014, 10:18 AM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Mao - 06-26-2014, 10:43 AM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Lythrilux - 06-26-2014, 10:45 AM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Mao - 06-26-2014, 11:48 AM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Lythrilux - 06-26-2014, 11:55 AM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Jack_Henderson - 06-26-2014, 04:18 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Jack_Henderson - 06-26-2014, 04:06 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by sindroms - 06-26-2014, 10:47 AM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Pavel - 06-26-2014, 11:35 AM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Lord Caedus - 06-26-2014, 11:47 AM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Lord Caedus - 06-26-2014, 12:05 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Pavel - 06-26-2014, 12:05 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Ayatolah - 06-26-2014, 12:18 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by SnakeLancerHaven - 06-26-2014, 12:50 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Mao - 06-26-2014, 03:57 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Syrus - 06-26-2014, 04:35 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by SnakeLancerHaven - 06-26-2014, 04:51 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Luke. - 06-26-2014, 04:55 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Jansen - 06-26-2014, 05:29 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Lonely_Ghost - 06-26-2014, 08:57 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Trogdor - 06-26-2014, 08:56 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Thyrzul - 06-26-2014, 09:19 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Trogdor - 06-27-2014, 09:08 AM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Luke. - 06-26-2014, 09:34 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Jack_Henderson - 06-27-2014, 10:13 AM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Lord Caedus - 06-27-2014, 10:28 AM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Mao - 06-27-2014, 10:54 AM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Jack_Henderson - 06-27-2014, 10:36 AM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Luke. - 06-27-2014, 01:48 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Lord Caedus - 06-27-2014, 01:45 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by SnakeLancerHaven - 09-06-2014, 06:59 PM
RE: What happened to Colonial BC - by Jeremy Hunter - 09-06-2014, 07:39 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode