Pirate ID

[Binski]

The reason was clearly described by Vulkhard Muller; the players with pirate ID pirated the Rogues and Mollys and Hackers themselves, then used their bases to dock/resupply. The rephack is the inRP consequence of the behaviour of the pirate ID-d players.

Which never should have been allowed. Do we settle in life for a system thats arranged because its easy? Or do we follow practicality? It might be easier for them to rephack the pirate ID, but its not practical to fr5 all pirate ID players. Since Rogues and Hackers are just pirates, slavers and smugglers, there should be little inherent conflict, unless a pirate chooses to attack them. Like with every other faction, that's when an FR5 should come in. Sorry if its so much work, but thats the only way to not be OP about black listing players they more than likely have common interests with than not. Another case of punishing the majority over a minority from years ago at that. ID wide FR5 in this case kills so much RP potential. Why not FR5 all freelancers too, ya never know who they're working for/with.

---

The Further Exploits of Captain Antares (August 2015) │ (alt) JonasHudson
*Argo | Special Operative ID (Approved Request)* | Argo Compilation Video
################ *Proposed OF Challenge System* ################
############### The Book of Piracy (Piracy Tutorial) ###############
############### Binski Alamo (Youtube Channel) ###############