Announcement Regarding Rule 1.2

[n00bl3t]

The only reason to be upset, is if you wish to skirt around the rules in order to annoy, upset or anger people, and do not want to be subject to any consequences for this.

Hmmm...

Is that a false dichotomy fallacy?

I think it is.

If there is any other options to intentionally trolling people within the rules and consequences being a worry, then this statement is false. Oh wait, let me think, the supposed dirty word bias comes up. That may be discredited, but it is still an option. It was brought up before. It has happened before. Thus, the logic does not hold.

If such a basic logical fallacy was committed, was it done so intentionally, and was it done so to troll anyone that voices concern into silence, over the rule changes?

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.