Die Wilden

[Cawdor]

i thought its about the faciton - besides. both "das wilde" as well as "die wilden" describes a plural. "das wilde" is neutral to the personae used. while "die wilden" is plural of "der wilde/die wilde". - anyway.....



i d say, only install a wild faction if the nomad faction runs flawlessly. - currently it doesn t, so we should wait with yet another terrorist faction.

whatever the plans, i suggest to make the wild faction open for all that wish to join - as opposed to the keepers that are invite only. other than that, i wouldn t care much about it - the wild has a very limited zoi and are similar to the LSF, imo ( acting "from the second row" sort of )

das wilde - the wildness
die wilden - group of wild people
things/beings which are known as neutral are mostly concidered male. you know ... like "der zerg" or something
i would suggest to use the english term anyway.

on topic, i think it wont be big of a difference if the faction is invite only or open to join by application. considering the really sensitive RP/PvP balance here, only very experienced RPers would be allowed to join anyway.

on a further note, i doubt that, if i was a wild, i would continue at a place where i was defeated and had to flee from los battle. as we saw, it was common to use nomad artefacts even in bars! people in rheinland know what they are like, how they act. in my opinion, they should relocate to a place where people never or at least rarely had contact with infested people. liberty, bretonia, borderworlds.

---

.

.