Oh, right, because I have to argument my standpoint and you don't.
Okay then: lawful good would serve their house because of some form of ideal or because of sense of honor. Neutral good would serve their house because of orders or necessity (say, LN serve Liberty because if they didn't, Gallia and Rheinland would wipe them off the map).
Quote:Of course it's applicable to any universe, if you reduce the universe heavily enough and brush out any nuances. I don't think the D&D alignment system is really conducive to roleplay, as in playing a nuanced and multi-faceted role that can be interpreted in different ways that are all true. The D&D alignment system implies that there is such a thing as an objective point of view from which to judge morality.
I fully agree there is no such thing as an objective point of view in terms of morality. However I suppose a particular faction or character can be generalised for the sake of alignment. I mean, literally everyone does it with outlining their primary, secondary and so on goals. Based on that you can apply the alignment system.
