Player Base Defense

[Karst]

Name of player(s)/faction(s): Name
Name of Player Owned Base: Name
Link to RP showing intent to defend: <Link>

And that is going to take a while and in that time the base is gone B|

and gg.

That's why you're supposed to do it before an attack occurs. You establish ties between the owners of the base and yourself / your faction so that you can defend it in case of an attack.

So your saying make RP specifically for defense?
Just sounds like more work. I rather just link the links I have for RP in general with other factions i am allied with.

Doesn't matter, really. The main point is to provide a link to roleplay that justifies your or your faction's intent to defend a base. Whether a thread is made specifically for this purpose or it's a part of another, related thread shouldn't make a difference.
Nor is it really the point of the thread - the template is just an example. The main issue I'm addressing is an imbalance due to the existence of an attack declaration thread that gives attack privileges, without an according defense declaration thread that gives defense privileges.

---