' Wrote:So, you say that only some need that. Why not start discussing them in civilized manner then? Or are you afraid of being a person who points out and thus want to force them to start in this mandatory manner somehow allowing you to speak whereas in truth you can speak at any given time? I'm sorry, but this is how I'm starting to view this after reading some posts made there, and I was thinking better of the idea at first. You know, if there is something you think is wrong - go ahead and discuss it, there is nothing wrong with discussing for as long as it remains civilized talk and doesn't degenerate into flame fest. Problem is - mostly likely it will, but then again may be not, it's how you keep the discussion going. Only flamers can be held liable for flaming. If something is wrong in your opinion, if something doesn't meet your high standards criteria - speak it out, but that doesn't necessarily that person(s) will agree with you. People have opinions and there is no singular ideal, but there is a set of requirements though, so don't mix those up really. Forcing other people here come and say "are we ok still?" on a regular basis, that's not a path to go in my opinion and it's getting dangerously close to "guilty until proven otherwise" kind of thing. Fair treatment isn't a holy banner, equality and fairness are different things too, fairness doesn't always remain the same across various people. I've seen people starting flaming, I've seen people staring civilized discussions, why trying to reinvent the wheel here if it's already there may I ask, and putting much hassle into it?
The wheel isn't already there, every time I have seen feedback threads they have descended into flame fest and been locked, before a resolution could be made. That is not productive. This is a method of ensuring that everyone gets the same treatment, that everyone meets the same requirements, as it stands it is not possible to do this, as they invariably start out as trial by forums and degenerate from there. I could start a discussion on any number of factions, but I would be seen as a whiner even though that is not the case, I simply would like to see all factions being equal. It does not hurt to have this feedback system in operation it does not remove freedoms and it is simply a method of checks and balances.
I must thank Lohingren at this point, if his feedback thread continues in the manner it has started then it shows that my logic is sound. I do believe that we can have a civilised discussion on the various factions, if people want to do it voluntarily then so much the better. However all factions should be brought up to date in such a fashion, not just some.
Saint Del is considered a holy healer of diseases of children, but also as a protector of cattle.