• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 … 16 17 18 19 20 … 198 Next »
Feedback to Admin Experiment.

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Core Dominance - 7 / 10,000
Humanity's Defiance - 80 / 10,000
Nomad Ascendancy - 46 / 10,000
Order Mastery - 10 / 10,000

Latest activity

Feedback to Admin Experiment.
Offline Pavel
12-31-2014, 05:04 PM,
#6
On leave
Posts: 2,018
Threads: 197
Joined: Jan 2012

I for one like the idea of such discussion threads. It was mainly faction-faction bad rivalry which somewhat derailed the GMG ID thread, but from general pov, there are a lot of cases when things aren't 100% clear, like "can GMG ask for payments in their systems" issue, or "can corrupt LPI/RFP/GRP play trade lane toll collectors". Discussions create chance for people oriented in the topic to bring up points supporting (for some controversial), yet inRP legit encounter outcomes. Aforementioned corrupt RFP trade lane toll collecting would be such issue.

Of course, such discussion threads need to be strictly moderated, and maintained in calm, constructive manner all the time, but as I said, I believe problematic persons in GMG ID thread caused trouble due to personal/faction bad rivalry, not due to the very nature of such, imo useful, threads.

As preceding post - Tunicle
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by Tunicle - 12-31-2014, 04:45 PM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by Omi - 12-31-2014, 04:46 PM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by Zen_Mechanics - 12-31-2014, 04:50 PM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by Karst - 12-31-2014, 04:52 PM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by Omi - 12-31-2014, 04:55 PM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by Hauler - 12-31-2014, 06:11 PM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by Pavel - 12-31-2014, 05:04 PM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by Sabru - 12-31-2014, 05:11 PM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by St.Denis - 12-31-2014, 05:20 PM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by Jack_Henderson - 12-31-2014, 05:35 PM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by GamerGirl - 12-31-2014, 06:00 PM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by Leppy - 12-31-2014, 05:52 PM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by Omi - 12-31-2014, 06:15 PM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by Doria - 12-31-2014, 07:22 PM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by Zen_Mechanics - 12-31-2014, 08:17 PM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by Alestone - 12-31-2014, 09:34 PM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by Parthenogenesis - 01-03-2015, 09:58 AM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by Hannibal - 01-03-2015, 11:32 AM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by ProwlerPC - 01-28-2015, 07:24 PM
RE: Feedback to Admin Experiment. - by Stoner_Steve - 01-28-2015, 08:51 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode