Researcher ID - It's coming back!

[n00bl3t]

That kind of goes under story in my book, but yes, something along those lines. The SRP is a good requirement for the ID, and it should be implemented, just the money req demolished. Like I said, it'd save a whole lot of time and effort. Let's face it; If you plant the ID, as powerful as is, as an open use one, there are eventually going to be MANY of those (you know them, sadly) silent powertrading types that'll just get caught and clutter up the sanctions. I'm willing to bet that if this ID were open, more than 90% of those caught abusing them would not have even had a forum account.

Edit; I meant n00blet, ninja'd by Toris

Isn't rational discussion of issues and fleshing out solutions great?

I pretty much agree with what you're suggesting. Maximum exposure of the ID and minimum sanction mess/work.

However, instead of having it SRP, but having an open thread posted into with requirements listed and ship name and purpose on the forum, wouldn't that cut down work and time taken and filter out people who aren't on the forums?