(01-18-2015, 02:23 PM)Mímir Wrote: ^I think you posted in the wrong thread
I was pointing out, as a reply to one of point about one (possibly kind of official) faction being over other factions of the same affiliation. As far as I recall, Moka threatened other Rogues to have their landing rights revoked from Rogue bases. That was exortion of the server rules, to be honest, since Liberty Rogues aren't one group in lore, but bunch of gangs. I don't see why Moka with PLR would even have a right to FR5 other Liberty Rogues, because they don't like her or her so-called Padua Rogues.
It doesn't make any sense, if Moka FR5-ed such players from all Rogue stations. That's too much for a faction that don't even call itself Liberty Rogues, but Padua Liberty Rogues, suggesting they only have control over one base.
This was done when Moka (Alte) lead LR-. Furthermore faction name doesn't alter the amount of influence a faction has on it's bases. Unless one of the factions doesn't want to manage base administration.
This is why we shouldn't follow same FR5 rights for unlawful groups, because they not really a one faction per lore. We should make another approach to avoid such things in the future, because one unlawful subfaction will NOT listen to the other unlawful subfaction, what makes sense - if their ideologies are way different.
To put it simple: lawful faction =/= unlawful faction. Lawful factions follow discipline and order, give it military or corporational one. Unlawful factions rarely follow any laws and it would be understandable that there would be issues and wars between the same affinity groups.
Just think about it. Such situations as leadership issues do not appear in militaries or corporations - as those are regulated by laws and such - but in criminal groups leadership issues are solved with open bloodshed, backstabbing or cold diplomacy.
