(01-18-2015, 02:15 PM)Toris James Gray Wrote: Sure, such situations as threating people with sanctions and FR5 because someone in Rogues came back, is something we should avoid. I mean, come on. Liberty Rogues are barely one group. Provided by some comms, Padua LR threatened the other Rogues who were not happy with return of so-called warlady and it makes 100% valiable roleplay. But FR5 is something that should be avoided, given specific situation with Liberty Rogues, as I don't believe Buffalo Rogues would follow Padua Rogues, asking "what the hell those arses think!?"
Liberty Rogues aren't disciplined fleet. They are gangs, gangs fight each other, they form allies against other gangs. Why not allow unlawfuls attack other unlawfuls of same affinity, without silly sanctionlancer and FR5? They aren't disciplined Military after all and leadership changes with each backstab and blackmailing, if not simple taking by one's head and banging it against wall, until the brain comes out.
With all respect, you are -just- Padua Liberty Rogues, not Liberty Rogues as a whole. It is like Bundschuh told to other Rheinland unlawfuls "we reign here, listen to us, you must obey us." Who gave you right to decide what Rogues would do, eh? You did it yourself? Then you should expect, in RP, hostility from other sub-factions and some crusades against PLR.
In roleplay, Moka after return would be assassinated for her disrespectful behaviour, just saying, because not everyone agrees over being "Supreme Warlady" and I wouldn't feel right if some arse just said "hey, listen to me, boors!" Most of situations like that, provided Liberty Rogues are gangs, ends up with dagger in your back, your head shot off or your throat slit. Just pointing out how real Liberty Rogues are meant to be.
I suggest making some RESEARCH .
You have no idea what you are talking about at all. Each paragraph you wrote has tones of errors.
If you dont know what you are talking about then dont try to until you know about such groups and the history that took place.
