• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Developers Forum Discovery Unofficial Development Discovery Mod Content Submissions
« Previous 1 … 9 10 11 12 13 … 28 Next »
Conquest for real

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Conquest for real
Offline Burning
01-24-2015, 07:03 PM,
#10
Light's Harbinger
Posts: 418
Threads: 42
Joined: Dec 2014

There are already many battlefield-systems like New Hampshire, Omicron Delta and the ones of the Bretonia-Gallia war.
Making some bases in these battlefield-systems captureable would cause RPs and pews. On my opinion, that's a good way to revive the battles in these systems (not only for raids).

Actually I'm expecting two problems here:
  1. In New Hampshire, for example, are not many stations/bases to capture. You'd have to add some. In the system map, you can set the filter to "political map". Don't know the possibilities of developening here, but maybe you could make them captureable. Negative point here: You don't really see/feel the change of the political map without watching on it.
  2. Let's say Rheinland just captured a base/battleship of Liberty in New Hampshire for example. The IFF changed, but it still sales the liberty equipment and ships.


Regards,
Burning
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Conquest for real - by SnakeLancerHaven - 01-13-2015, 11:13 PM
RE: Conquest for real - by Thyrzul - 01-14-2015, 12:46 AM
RE: Conquest for real - by WesternPeregrine - 01-14-2015, 01:04 AM
RE: Conquest for real - by Krmloo - 01-14-2015, 01:10 AM
RE: Conquest for real - by Sabru - 01-14-2015, 02:07 AM
RE: Conquest for real - by Highland Laddie - 01-14-2015, 04:11 AM
RE: Conquest for real - by SnakeLancerHaven - 01-14-2015, 10:00 AM
RE: Conquest for real - by Connor - 01-14-2015, 08:47 PM
RE: Conquest for real - by Colonel Mustang - 01-20-2015, 07:30 PM
RE: Conquest for real - by Burning - 01-24-2015, 07:03 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode