• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Site & Forum Feedback Discovery Wiki
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 14 Next »
LAC Review

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

LAC Review
Offline Tarator
03-08-2015, 09:32 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-08-2015, 02:56 PM by Tarator.)
#10
Member
Posts: 435
Threads: 21
Joined: Dec 2010

(03-08-2015, 08:38 AM)zslayern Wrote: If the wiki is accurate, the "Redemption" has a gun mount of 6 Heavies with the highest standard of 4 Primaries. Dosen't that make it the strongest in terms of gun mounts?
On a more related note: The review very detailed. *steals battletactics listed there*

I'm talking about all mounts, thats the ship with the most gun mounts currently available (27).
But you're indeed right, the Redemption has the most heavies.

(03-08-2015, 08:40 AM)Bulldog. Wrote: Nice review.
I flew one a long time ago and it indeed is a pain with those secondary mounts. But when coming to face other BS it is kinda hard. But (y)

Yeah I should have included that, the ship's terrible at tanking due the low number of heavies but I've never had a problem with that because simply I don't tank Big Grin

(03-08-2015, 12:11 AM)Error Wrote: It's actually not that far off, even if it's only by chance; if you want to put it into a collapsible box you can use the {{Spoiler|spoiler content goes here|title goes here}} template.
As for the review: I like it, nice work! It looks pretty solid to me, and is by far one of the most in-depth and detailed reviews that I've seen around on the Wiki in a good while. The same goes for your English, by the way; there's absolutely no need to apologize for anything. I unfortunately cannot comment on it much beyond how it reads, though, as I haven't actually flown or got an LAC myself; not quite rich enough for one these days. Tongue

Tried the template but I couldn't really make it work, guess I'm too silly for that kind of stuff.

[Image: giphy.gif]
O'Rhu Cell Database|||O'Rhu Cell Feedback|||Join O'Rhu Cell|||Jump
  Reply  


Messages In This Thread
LAC Review - by Tarator - 03-07-2015, 12:13 AM
RE: LAC Review - by Caelumaresh - 03-07-2015, 10:47 PM
RE: LAC Review - by Tarator - 03-07-2015, 10:48 PM
RE: LAC Review - by Error - 03-08-2015, 12:11 AM
RE: LAC Review - by Black Widow - 03-08-2015, 12:50 AM
RE: LAC Review - by Chuba - 03-08-2015, 12:51 AM
RE: LAC Review - by Tarator - 03-08-2015, 07:41 AM
RE: LAC Review - by zslayern - 03-08-2015, 08:38 AM
RE: LAC Review - by Bulldog. - 03-08-2015, 08:40 AM
RE: LAC Review - by Tarator - 03-08-2015, 09:32 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode