.:j:. Junker Congress Faction Feedback

[Pinko]

That doesn't necessarily mean that Congress views the consequences that come out of this trial as something binding upon them. They may simply view this as nothing more than a story from their watering hole. That attitude would explain their RP of bringing guns to a court of law. If they don't expect any consequences out of this, then they could do whatever they want as far as RP is concerned and not have to worry at all.

So, my question stands. Does Congress view this trial as a legitimate event, in which its decisions are binding upon them? I would love an answer from Congress on this.

If this was a watering hole story, then it would be a watering hole story. In fact, is there something that makes watering holes less legitimate stories? SRPs are accepted all the time from the Stories section of the forums, so surely they have some kind of meaning, no? I thought Stories were meant to enhance and complement the roleplay of factions both in-game and on the forums?

EDIT: In fact, considering the roleplay involves two entities that exist in-game, can something be done about this if one of them decides to disregard the outcome of said trial?