(04-07-2015, 10:44 AM)milano Wrote: i also have to admit that a trader who paid me once isnt safe from me... i began demanding second or third payments when they start saying some llike f-pirate - get a real ship coward or some like that
making more demands after your initial demand is fulfilled? thats questionable at best, sanction worthy at worst.
No it is no.
If you get insulted after you let go your prey, you go out of your way to show the smartass trader that he is in the bottom on the food chain.
It's worse to use rules as a shield and sword, rather than simply going for genuine and realistic roleplay.
So you are just ignoring the rules cuz you don't like someone talking back then ? You do know that you are wrong no? Like very wrong
Quote:3.3 Aggressors are not allowed to issue further demands during the same encounter after the trade vessel has complied, or destroy a trade vessel prior to issuing a demand, in system or local chat. "Halt" on its own is not a demand, however, a trade vessel can be destroyed if they refuse to stop after being asked to in the form of a proper demand.
(04-07-2015, 12:31 PM)sindroms Wrote: That is what I am talking about.
If that specific rule was implemented due to unreasonable demands, hit the individual players as the reports come in.
Traders need repercussions if they decide to be smartasses after they pay.
I agree next time you catch them, blow them up before "playing" with them a bit.
I think that is good enough
That is what I do. And when it comes to tagged vessels, if one talks smack i take revenge on all, till i get compensated accordingly.