• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 97 98 99 100 101 … 780 Next »
Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor
Offline Fluffyball
05-13-2015, 08:27 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-13-2015, 08:37 PM by Fluffyball.)
#4
Banned
Posts: 2,420
Threads: 222
Joined: Jul 2013

Actually it might be complicated. As we can read in vanillia Blood Dragons' description, they fight for "restoration of their Imperial line". This could mean that both Emperor and Shogun are present in the government, with predominant role of the Shogun. Like in Edo Period of Japan, under Tokugawa Bakufu.

Figure of Emperor could be just symbolic, like in very turbulent times from Onin War till the Meiji Restoration.

User was banned for: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=138636
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by jammi - 05-13-2015, 07:39 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Char Aznable - 05-13-2015, 08:14 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by TheSauron - 05-13-2015, 08:25 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Fluffyball - 05-13-2015, 08:27 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by jammi - 05-13-2015, 08:37 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Fluffyball - 05-13-2015, 08:39 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by jammi - 05-13-2015, 08:58 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Miaou - 05-13-2015, 09:08 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by WesternPeregrine - 05-13-2015, 09:09 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Highland Laddie - 05-13-2015, 09:29 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Sabru - 05-14-2015, 05:55 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Zelot - 05-14-2015, 07:34 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Durandal - 05-15-2015, 02:59 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Teerin - 05-15-2015, 04:56 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by SnakeLancerHaven - 05-14-2015, 08:49 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Yoshi.Sato - 05-14-2015, 09:09 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Fluffyball - 05-14-2015, 12:36 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Zelot - 05-14-2015, 10:54 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Omicron - 05-15-2015, 01:24 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Lord Caedus - 05-15-2015, 07:17 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Fluffyball - 05-15-2015, 08:08 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode