• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 97 98 99 100 101 … 780 Next »
Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor
Offline WesternPeregrine
05-13-2015, 09:09 PM,
#9
Kusari Vanguard
Posts: 2,311
Threads: 166
Joined: Oct 2013

Regarding the matter if Kusari is (was) an Empire, or a Shogunate: While a Shogunate can be a form of government (like a military junta, or a dicatorship), it is not a form of State. Therefore, Kusari for all purposes was an Empire.

On the matter of who is the boss: This question has been raised on the development channel of Kusari, on matters relating to KNF and Samura, and on the concept of the Exiles.

We were faced with the same gaps related as to the "original" form of state that Kusari took after planetfall. There is not direct lore written regarding anything before the Sakura coup, other than the origins and "player written lore" of Samura and Kishiro.

It also struck me as odd that, being an empire, the deposed element of the Dragons was a Shogun, and it's not clear if this Shogun held power on his own, or under the legitimacy of a puppet emperor in the background. Same as the vanilla Shogun Edo that you have researched.

There is also very little lore available about the rest of the political systems of the Settlement Regime, the Hideyoshi Shogunate, or the post Sakura/Vanilla government, other than the mention of the Prefects/Governors. No mentions of nobility, ministers or territorial divisions, other than the faint allusion to the current Prefectural System.

----------------

Of course, such gaps have left plenty of space for everyone to imagine how the past shaped the present, and added their own flavor. Imperials have built an image of a despotic Emperor, one that takes to the battlefield like some crusader king. Many Dragon players roleplay old nobility families disgraced by the Sakura coup, wishing to recover their "Planet sized titles" of ownership alongside to the return of a Shogun (or Shoguns?, every incarnation is a new Shogun family).

------------------

Devs of old never bothered to reshape the old storyline of Kusari, to fill up those continuity gaps. I can't say it is a bad thing, but probably it was the wisest choice, if it was ever pondered.

[+]SIGNATURE
Kusari Former Mastermind
========================
| The Kusari Legal Codex |
| Character Profiles | The North Star Bulletin News|
[Image: 5tZIDB3.jpg]

-
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by jammi - 05-13-2015, 07:39 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Char Aznable - 05-13-2015, 08:14 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by TheSauron - 05-13-2015, 08:25 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Fluffyball - 05-13-2015, 08:27 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by jammi - 05-13-2015, 08:37 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Fluffyball - 05-13-2015, 08:39 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by jammi - 05-13-2015, 08:58 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Miaou - 05-13-2015, 09:08 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by WesternPeregrine - 05-13-2015, 09:09 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Highland Laddie - 05-13-2015, 09:29 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Sabru - 05-14-2015, 05:55 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Zelot - 05-14-2015, 07:34 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Durandal - 05-15-2015, 02:59 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Teerin - 05-15-2015, 04:56 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by SnakeLancerHaven - 05-14-2015, 08:49 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Yoshi.Sato - 05-14-2015, 09:09 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Fluffyball - 05-14-2015, 12:36 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Zelot - 05-14-2015, 10:54 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Omicron - 05-15-2015, 01:24 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Lord Caedus - 05-15-2015, 07:17 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Fluffyball - 05-15-2015, 08:08 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode