• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 97 98 99 100 101 … 780 Next »
Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor
Offline Yoshi.Sato
05-14-2015, 09:09 AM,
#14
Member
Posts: 82
Threads: 16
Joined: Apr 2015

I am new to Kusari RP, and Disco in general. Since February when i started, i been trying to absorb as much as i can about the diplomatic, and historical dynamics. And there are some details related to this post are unclear.
When Kusari was in war with Bretonia, and the Gallics poped out of nowhere, they attacked both Kusari and Bretonia, following that Kusari has surrendered since it was lacking of sufficient military power, and Bretonia continued fighting. Exiles are Kusari Naval forces that fought back against Gallia with Bretonia instead of fighting against each other. Kusari become a Republic, so where is that leaving the Emperor, and the Shogun?
Also what i would like to learn more about is the nature of the Kusari attitude toward Gallia, to me it seems like it is a forced surrender at gunpoint, rather than what the wiki say about Kusari as "Gallia's only friend in Sirius" or "allied".
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by jammi - 05-13-2015, 07:39 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Char Aznable - 05-13-2015, 08:14 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by TheSauron - 05-13-2015, 08:25 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Fluffyball - 05-13-2015, 08:27 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by jammi - 05-13-2015, 08:37 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Fluffyball - 05-13-2015, 08:39 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by jammi - 05-13-2015, 08:58 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Miaou - 05-13-2015, 09:08 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by WesternPeregrine - 05-13-2015, 09:09 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Highland Laddie - 05-13-2015, 09:29 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Sabru - 05-14-2015, 05:55 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Zelot - 05-14-2015, 07:34 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Durandal - 05-15-2015, 02:59 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Teerin - 05-15-2015, 04:56 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by SnakeLancerHaven - 05-14-2015, 08:49 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Yoshi.Sato - 05-14-2015, 09:09 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Fluffyball - 05-14-2015, 12:36 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Zelot - 05-14-2015, 10:54 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Omicron - 05-15-2015, 01:24 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Lord Caedus - 05-15-2015, 07:17 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Fluffyball - 05-15-2015, 08:08 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode