• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 97 98 99 100 101 … 780 Next »
Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor
Offline Fluffyball
05-14-2015, 12:36 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-14-2015, 12:57 PM by Fluffyball.)
#15
Banned
Posts: 2,420
Threads: 222
Joined: Jul 2013

Rheinland is also friend of Gallia, supposedly omnited fact by many.

As for Kusari, there are several homages to the real life Japan. Look at Kyoto Base, it derives name from actual Kyoto, which was place in which emperors were. Shogun Hideyoshi is homage to the real Hideyoshi Toyotomi, who founded his (short-lived) Imperial line and after his death, his former lord-regent Tokugawa Ieyasu won in single battle, crushing loyalists - what later give foundation to his (more homage) Tokugawa Shogunate. Shogun Edo is yet another homage, as actual political power came not from Emperor's city of Kyoto, but from Tokugawa's city of Edo (now: Tokyo). But, as seen many times, both Emperor and Shogun of Japan were usually from the same clan, until Tokugawa kicked in. (Despite being counted as Shogun, Nobunaga Oda never got his title officially as he was assassinated at Temple Honno nearby Kyoto.)

That's why I pressume Emperor was given so marginal role his actual position is only titular.

(05-14-2015, 05:55 AM)Sabru Wrote: so theoretically, the Exiles arent fighting to restore the "Emperor" but just fighting to install their favored shogunate?

Nice read. doesnt change that much though, it seems.

As I wrote above, it's small difference, as I pressume that Emperor is in very marginal position, with Shogun being in factual control of Kusari (military regime). That would make Kusari's situation right now even funnier, because Kishiro replaced one regime with another regime. And, to make it even funnier, no one actually stated that Kusari doesn't have a new Emperor, just in the very marginal place as he was.

User was banned for: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=138636
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by jammi - 05-13-2015, 07:39 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Char Aznable - 05-13-2015, 08:14 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by TheSauron - 05-13-2015, 08:25 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Fluffyball - 05-13-2015, 08:27 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by jammi - 05-13-2015, 08:37 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Fluffyball - 05-13-2015, 08:39 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by jammi - 05-13-2015, 08:58 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Miaou - 05-13-2015, 09:08 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by WesternPeregrine - 05-13-2015, 09:09 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Highland Laddie - 05-13-2015, 09:29 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Sabru - 05-14-2015, 05:55 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Zelot - 05-14-2015, 07:34 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Durandal - 05-15-2015, 02:59 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Teerin - 05-15-2015, 04:56 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by SnakeLancerHaven - 05-14-2015, 08:49 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Yoshi.Sato - 05-14-2015, 09:09 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Fluffyball - 05-14-2015, 12:36 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Zelot - 05-14-2015, 10:54 PM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Omicron - 05-15-2015, 01:24 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Lord Caedus - 05-15-2015, 07:17 AM
RE: Controversial: Kusari never had an Emperor - by Fluffyball - 05-15-2015, 08:08 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode