• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Unofficial Factions and Groups
« Previous 1 … 164 165 166 167 168 … 390 Next »
Daumann Heavy Construction feedback

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Daumann Heavy Construction feedback
Offline Danny-boy
05-16-2015, 02:41 PM,
#98
Member
Posts: 293
Threads: 11
Joined: Jul 2014

No worries, though the revised thread still seems a little like powergaming to me (Though I assume the admins have given it the all clear, so after this post I will drop the matter and let you guys decide what you want to do in peace). I'll briefly explain why I believe it is still powergaming as well as provide you with a possible alternative (that ofc if you don't like you can simply discard).

The reason I still believe it to be powergaming is the fact that after my character receives this message, it his in his/her possession therefore they should be able to do whatever they please with it, even prevent it from blowing up in their face (in whatever rp manor you can conceive, be it having a super computer to edit the file to not blow up or something else). After all, not allowing them to use this inrp item/code in their possession how they see fit would be controlling and interfering with that characters rp. This comes under the definition of powergaming that we use here on disco.

Now I understand you don't want tattle-tale Tim getting DHC in a pile of horse manure, so here is an alternative suggestion from myself that you can do whatever you please with. Instead of having this message so that something out of the recipients hands happens to their characters rp possessions once they open it, create a situation were it could never be linked back to DHC in the first place. So for example, use Ageria's super cool 'anonymizing proxy service' so that the message was never officially sent from DHC in the first place and anyone could have sent such a message.

This means that the recipient can do anything they want with the message once they have received it (even open it without it deleting itself), thus there is no powergaming. And DHC aren't implicated in anything illegal because they never sent any messages which they perhaps shouldn't be sending, according to the RFP.

Well I'll leave you with those ideas to do what you will, anyway best of luck to you and see you in space.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Daumann Heavy Construction - 07-24-2012, 01:57 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by indy.miner1 - 11-27-2012, 01:26 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 11-27-2012, 03:58 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Cris - 01-23-2013, 01:42 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Blitzbirne91 - 03-24-2013, 01:27 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Daumann Heavy Construction - 03-24-2013, 03:22 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Rodnas - 08-13-2013, 09:38 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 08-17-2013, 11:52 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Rodnas - 08-17-2013, 12:26 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Karst - 12-06-2013, 06:45 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Highland Laddie - 12-06-2013, 07:52 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 12-08-2013, 01:15 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Gytrash - 02-04-2015, 07:23 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Moberg - 02-04-2015, 07:47 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Gytrash - 02-04-2015, 08:19 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Gytrash - 02-04-2015, 08:51 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Stoner_Steve - 02-04-2015, 08:06 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Wildkins - 02-04-2015, 08:12 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Stoner_Steve - 02-04-2015, 08:16 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Moberg - 02-04-2015, 08:13 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Wildkins - 02-04-2015, 08:20 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Stoner_Steve - 02-04-2015, 08:29 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Aazalot - 02-04-2015, 08:21 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Moberg - 02-04-2015, 09:18 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Gytrash - 02-04-2015, 09:32 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Wildkins - 02-04-2015, 08:22 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Gytrash - 02-04-2015, 08:24 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Wildkins - 02-04-2015, 08:25 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Wildkins - 02-04-2015, 08:34 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Stoner_Steve - 02-04-2015, 08:43 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Aazalot - 02-04-2015, 09:35 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Moberg - 02-04-2015, 09:53 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Aazalot - 02-04-2015, 10:03 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Moberg - 02-04-2015, 10:11 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Aazalot - 02-04-2015, 10:15 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 02-05-2015, 09:17 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Omi - 02-05-2015, 09:23 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pancakes - 02-05-2015, 09:35 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by HeadHunter - 02-05-2015, 10:03 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 02-05-2015, 10:11 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Thyrzul - 02-05-2015, 10:11 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Moberg - 02-05-2015, 10:25 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Omi - 02-05-2015, 10:28 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by S A D B O Y - 02-05-2015, 10:26 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Doria - 02-05-2015, 11:48 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 02-06-2015, 10:04 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 02-06-2015, 02:53 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 02-06-2015, 05:07 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 02-06-2015, 05:53 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by HeadHunter - 02-06-2015, 06:45 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 02-06-2015, 07:06 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jansen - 02-06-2015, 08:18 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Stoner_Steve - 02-06-2015, 08:41 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 02-06-2015, 08:42 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Doria - 02-06-2015, 08:43 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Doria - 02-06-2015, 08:58 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 02-06-2015, 09:22 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Stoner_Steve - 02-06-2015, 10:00 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Eduard - 02-06-2015, 09:31 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 02-06-2015, 10:08 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pancakes - 02-08-2015, 10:57 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 02-08-2015, 03:32 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Shinju - 02-09-2015, 09:30 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 02-11-2015, 11:59 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by FRS- Free Renegade Society - 05-04-2015, 11:54 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-08-2015, 12:01 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 11:02 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 11:27 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 05-16-2015, 11:38 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by jammi - 05-16-2015, 11:42 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 11:43 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 05-16-2015, 11:53 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by SpaceTime - 05-16-2015, 11:59 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 12:10 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by SpaceTime - 05-16-2015, 12:19 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by QuinnZai - 05-16-2015, 12:15 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 12:18 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 12:24 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Danny-boy - 05-16-2015, 12:27 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Havok - 05-16-2015, 12:37 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 12:38 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Doria - 05-16-2015, 12:38 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Moberg - 05-16-2015, 12:44 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Danny-boy - 05-16-2015, 12:45 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 12:47 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Doria - 05-16-2015, 12:53 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Danny-boy - 05-16-2015, 12:54 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 12:55 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 01:00 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Danny-boy - 05-16-2015, 01:00 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Sabru - 05-16-2015, 01:05 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Danny-boy - 05-16-2015, 01:11 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 05-16-2015, 01:18 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jansen - 05-16-2015, 01:21 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 02:03 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 02:40 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Danny-boy - 05-16-2015, 02:41 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 06-04-2015, 10:46 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by BoyHippo - 03-25-2016, 09:26 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 04-23-2016, 12:03 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Stoner_Steve - 04-23-2016, 03:22 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 04-23-2016, 03:27 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Loki 666 - 04-23-2016, 04:15 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jansen - 04-23-2016, 04:53 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 04-23-2016, 05:23 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Lythrilux - 04-23-2016, 05:26 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Virus- - 04-23-2016, 10:43 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by nOmnomnOm - 04-24-2016, 07:51 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 04-24-2016, 07:53 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by nOmnomnOm - 04-24-2016, 08:56 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 05-27-2016, 12:01 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-27-2016, 12:10 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Xenon - 05-27-2016, 04:17 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Stoner_Steve - 05-27-2016, 05:11 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-27-2016, 05:38 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Xenon - 05-27-2016, 05:54 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode