BHG-Krakken Class Battleship

[Tarator]

His recommendation I meant, and it should be, core need a dreadnought not a carrier, also this may seem somewhat thematic, but in reality its because the mako is close to garbage in group fights, like really, bad armor, a flat side and a turn rate a tad bit faster than a 5ker is not good at all in group fights, and people QQ whenever Core uses threshers or Bottlenoses.

Id say put it in as a dreadnought, a heavier battleship is necessary more than a carrier, with the gunships and destroyers core has bombers aren't all that necessary.

You've made two statements here that totally contradict with each other. Firstly, no Mako isn't garbage in group fights. As if we assume you'd keep using bottlenose's and threshers, the Mako fits with them just nicely. Not to mention that those two ships are extremely effective against caps.

And as people said, a carrier doesn't go with a fwd, that would also make no sense RP wise, and I'd also like adding something here.
Fwd doesn't usually go with light battleships as well, hence you'd expect the model to have Overlord stats adding a fwd to it is a no go for balance, since Overlord has some of the best stats around.

Also

the Core would not be receiving a second light battleship if this ship was (hypothetically) accepted; it would have to be a heavier battleship/dreadnought.

That said, I wouldn't see much sense in Core having a heavy battleship neither, one that I'd assume almost nobody would be flying, not to mention that Core have little to no justification for one.

---

O'Rhu Cell Database|||O'Rhu Cell Feedback|||Join O'Rhu Cell|||Jump