Yes, you made a point like that already yesterday:
[2015.05.31. 19:00:47 | Edited 19:00:57] translucent-rabbit: My and Karst point is - THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED BEFORE, NOT AFTER THE CHANGE IS MADE.
Two things:
1) I still don't know why we're discussing this here. Especially since we had the same talk on Skype yesterday.
2) I don't understand why we're discussing who was or was not involved in the decision making instead of discussing the key factors and process of implementation when it looks like no one is against the decision itself. It would be much more productive.