Liberty Navy [LN] Feedback Thread

[Teerin]

Re-read the post.

Baker's transmission was not, and is not, official navy policy. It's an indication of individual expression, and a result of someone roleplaying a character, rather than a cardboard cut out. There may be repercussions in-character for her actions, that's not for me to say, but it seems ludicrous to me to attack the player for actions conducted by the character.

If you've got a character that would disagree with Baker's actions, you're more than welcome to act on that disagreement in-character. Write a letter. Stage a demonstration, whatever floats your boat.

But, for the sake of common sense, let's restrict roleplay disagreements to in-roleplay interactions, rather than attack someone for the views their character holds.

Commissar has hit the nail on the head. In regards to the "feedback" here; sadly it hasn't been very constructive, worsened by the fact that the actions of Rachel Baker were already explained, and so were the motives of Sarawr. Players are free to roleplay their characters in-character, even if they disagree with what the player actually feels. Shocker! It's called ... roleplay!

Yes, that's right, not every character is a copy of their owner's personality and tastes. Furthermore, not every character is a perfect "Mary Sue" archetype, nor do they all share their faction's ideals. Illustrating examples can be founded all over, and this is one of them. Believe it or not, until recently there was another Liberty Navy officer who was somewhat sympathetic of the HF Legion.

Carry on this debate about random minutiae if you wish, but I believe Wildkins, Maskage, Sarawr, and especially Commissar, have explained this enough. We appreciate your concern, and thank you for your time. If you still think that the Navy wishes to shut down LPI, you're mistaken, and I'll ask you to --

Re-read the post.