Admin Feedback Thread (Archived)

[Timmy]

Snoopy, you've forgot to comment on the second part of the suggestion, AKA player request to review the sanction by another admin. Yes, one person verdict would open world for bias possibilities, but it doesn't always make sanction unfair, even by the understanding of a sanctioned person. So why not do it? You would issue sanctions much faster, focusing too much attention on cases that do require this attention, no?

Btw, look at your own phrasing of that message:

Believe it or not but most of the staff team work hard. It's just that it's mostly behind the scenes.

Kinda ironic. Anyway, I have no doubts that most are doing their work hard, yet it doesn't change the fact that some work is being overthought, some work is being underthought because of previous. And it's all down to the system you've described.

Multiple people voting can have things cleared up and missed things pointed out (as it has happened many times). A definitive decision is made by several people that all agree, there's little chance they'd be wrong. More accurate. On the other hand it can take its time.

If any sanction that is processed with such care, it takes your time and time of the community as well, although last is rather their ingame time then real. And I doubt that you would disagree that all the delayed sanctions have been worth of such care couldn't be just processed by one person, giving other admins time to do other things, and draging their attention only when it's necessary.