• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 83 84 85 86 87 … 779 Next »
Cloak Disruptor VS Cruise Disruptor: About time for that change

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Cloak Disruptor VS Cruise Disruptor: About time for that change
Offline Binski
12-31-2015, 03:18 AM,
#1
Member
Posts: 1,531
Threads: 96
Joined: Jun 2013

Well we've had Cloak Disruptors for a while now, I see they're winding up on the market and aren't too unreasonably priced.

To boot, I've seen one used quite well myself and think they work fine in conjunction with the new cloak sounds.

So now its time to make people really invest. Of course I'll get all sorts of accusations of bias. I must fully admit though, I'm tired of regular CD's ending the cloak charge sequence on any cloak. Just hear me out:

Now that we have Cloak Disruptors, the danger on a cloakable vessel is double. The other problem is, no one really feels they need a Cloak CD yet because regular CD's still work on cloaks, and most of the time you encounter someone with a cloak, and they are visible, you don't need to worry that much. Snub cloaks have the best chance yes, but all the others are guaranteed useless if you're within range of a faster ship with a simple CD. We cloakers again give up our regular CM so we wind up triple screwed if someone with a cloak CD is around, and regular CD. And so what's the counter argument? I should just use my cloak before I enter an encounter... and to even get use out it, use it in advance instead of taking the risk?

So, should anyone still be able to trump all cloaks? When the tech used against them is now getting stacked, I feel like the value of catching a cloaking ship should be going up too. Cloaks cost how much? and require how much in resources to build? And yet still anyone with a simple train CD can eliminate the cloak on any non snub craft with great ease.

My argument? Aside from the snub cloaks, cloaks have long charge times. Its at least 30s before you actually go invisible and become un selectable, on the Mk2, longer of course for the others. I'm starting to really feel that players should not be able to interrupt cloaks with long charge times. I mean, wasn't the point of lowering the shields and giving charge time, to make it risky to the cloaker to try to cloak and escape? During that time you're highly exposed. I'd like to see a world where the pursuer simply tries to destroy the ship before it gets cloaked, rather than continue CD spam and relax, 'cuz this fool bought a cloak and paid hundreds of millions for their own death' when really, it should be usable to escape if you can survive the charge time.

I've dealt with it for as long as I've been here and for a while it seemed fair. Not any more. No one will buy or bother using these cloak disruptors until the have no choice. If a person wants to be able to take down a cloaker, they should need access to a cloak disruptor. It turns it into a balanced money sink vs money sink, which is far more fair to me. As it stands, the odds are too stacked against cloakers, and those of you who feel cloaks are bad for activity...consider: People stay cloaked in certain situations because they know once they're exposed, they're stuck that way. If people felt the cloak would work how they dreamed/envisioned, to help them get out of bad situations when they need it, they might be a little more willing to show themselves, RP, and fight, with confidence they can make a reasonable escape attempt, in a form they worked hard for and heavily invested in.

Long story short, people already can't catch snub cloaks with CD's usually, the rest of us suffer when now there are even more advantages to be sought to beat cloaks. The cloak should work, if I'm willing to take the risk and lower my shield in battle, that's the counterbalance. CD's will work to keep you from cruising, and that's fine, it keeps you in the battle until you could get cloaked. All I know is, no one's going to rush out for Cloak Disruptors (now that they're becoming availble) because the old CD's work just fine in 99% of circumstances. I think if that were to change, so would the market, and so would the value of engaging a cloaker, or as a cloaker. Besides, aren't there ships with more than one CD slot? So they could mount both regular and anti-cloak (is this correct??), have decent chances of forcing them to be visible and knock them out of cruise... Well that seems fair if ships without the anti-cloak can only stop cruise...not charging or a ship already cloaked.

Now again you shout bias but come on, its not that I think cloaks should be unbeatable, I just think it should no longer be so easy every regular player. Any entry level player can beat one, or anyone only willing to sink a few mil into a fighter. There are cloaks, and now there are cloak CD's. One investment (cloak) beats the regular (CM's), the counter 'sink' investment beats the first one. Everyone money sinks for armors and caps, cloaks and JDs, because you need to in order to get those effects. Right now, the cloak CD is not 'needed' by most and so will not be used as much. People spending minimal should not trump those spending high, in time or credits. If you want to trump a cloak, you should now have to basically spend about the same as he who spent on the cloak. I haven't fell victim to a Cloak CD yet, and my bet is I won't anytime soon if things stay the same. Should there be a change to regular CD's, I believe the number of Cloak CD's floating around will start to go up. Instead of being irritated that players with much easier to achieve set ups killing my cloak... when it does happen, I'll be impressed! Having my cloak fail is not bad as long as not any average joe can do it anymore. I'd like an assurance factor that they'll have to put more time and effort into it as opposed to using a CD that costs less than a mil. Time to make them fork out some cash like the rest of us! Fighters are cheap! Cloaks and high RP investments are not.

Economically I would also expect perhaps even a rise in the value of cloaks, and their CD's. The possibility is that if value on cloaks go up, less cloaks wind up circulating, less loss to cloaks, but again, more of a fair system of beating a cloak when it does happen...and cloaks become less of an 'avoiding you altogether' tool and more of a paid escape (pending you survive the charge); one that can be countered with the right tech of about equal cost, for those determined to win that kind of battle. If MkII's were 600 mil instead of 300, because then people would REALLY want them and then also others would really need the CD to counter. So my question to those who would just DIE if they couldn't CD transport cloaks...whats so wrong with needing to work on it like we do with everything else? Could you have to change some things, like ship, to guarantee catching a cloaker? Sure, but that's what makes sense to me. Either take your chances or recognize the need to specialize!

Thanks and cheers.

[Image: G38aJ6J.jpg]
The Further Exploits of Captain Antares (August 2015) │ (alt) JonasHudson
*Argo | Special Operative ID (Approved Request)* | Argo Compilation Video
################ *Proposed OF Challenge System* ################
############### The Book of Piracy (Piracy Tutorial) ###############
############### Binski Alamo (Youtube Channel) ###############
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Cloak Disruptor VS Cruise Disruptor: About time for that change - by Binski - 12-31-2015, 03:18 AM
RE: Cloak Disruptor VS Cruise Disruptor: About time for that change - by Antonio - 12-31-2015, 09:36 AM
RE: Cloak Disruptor VS Cruise Disruptor: About time for that change - by realekki - 12-31-2015, 10:36 AM
RE: Cloak Disruptor VS Cruise Disruptor: About time for that change - by Dawson Base - 12-31-2015, 10:54 AM
RE: Cloak Disruptor VS Cruise Disruptor: About time for that change - by Thunderer - 12-31-2015, 11:51 AM
RE: Cloak Disruptor VS Cruise Disruptor: About time for that change - by Connor - 12-31-2015, 12:53 PM
RE: Cloak Disruptor VS Cruise Disruptor: About time for that change - by sasapinjic - 12-31-2015, 12:49 PM
RE: Cloak Disruptor VS Cruise Disruptor: About time for that change - by Nexodius - 12-31-2015, 12:50 PM
RE: Cloak Disruptor VS Cruise Disruptor: About time for that change - by Thunderer - 12-31-2015, 01:01 PM
RE: Cloak Disruptor VS Cruise Disruptor: About time for that change - by nOmnomnOm - 12-31-2015, 01:35 PM
RE: Cloak Disruptor VS Cruise Disruptor: About time for that change - by An'shur - 12-31-2015, 04:00 PM
RE: Cloak Disruptor VS Cruise Disruptor: About time for that change - by 7AlphaOne1 - 12-31-2015, 04:36 PM
RE: Cloak Disruptor VS Cruise Disruptor: About time for that change - by Thunderer - 12-31-2015, 04:56 PM
RE: Cloak Disruptor VS Cruise Disruptor: About time for that change - by Haste - 12-31-2015, 04:58 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode