Dear devs and admins:

[Daedric]

No, it's because I understand that we're pushing the server to its limits already. FL can only run on a single core, blahblahblahblah.

Long story short is that the software is hella unstable and always was, adding in stuff like player bases didn't help.

Though I can understand why you'd respond with something like that, to quote yourself:

Of course, you don't consider nor understand that the development team has/is working on solutions. Do I really need to point ya to Friday's signature? Do I?

Adding in player bases didn't bother the stability of the software at all. The problem is the grouping of so many ships all pewing. As I said, you don't understand what you're talking about.

We had the same issues when there were massive fleet battles; those, however, didn't/don't happen as much as base sieges do.

So while you are correct in that the software is somewhat unstable, you're inability to understand the subject at hand has led you to a rather ignorant conclusion. That is, that player bases are the cause of said instability, when in fact that are not.

Edit: If I were to agree that the logic used in this thread was valid (which it isn't) and applied it to real life. I'd have the justification to exterminate all of mankind. I mean, we are making our world unstable, why not remove us from the equation?

No, we're doing the intelligent (survival instincts too) thing and finding a way to correct that instability without taking such radical steps.

---

Helpful Discovery Guides

Get Help Here! | Player Base Guide | Mining Guide | Trading Guide

Reputation Guide | Zoner Rep Guide

OSI Information | Join OSI! | Nichols Trade Center
OSI Bounty Board | OSI Feedback