(02-24-2016, 04:45 PM)Malmsteen Wrote: [font=Open Sans] @"Shikeh" , My bad, i was told the story, i wasn't there, So forgive me, its 2 corvo explorers not 1 , So does this make it a gangbang by BMF?
@Wesker I understand your point, but the other ships are not belonging to BMF, but maybe 1 of them belong to a member of BMF (another different character, with BAF ID not BMF) ...
I tried to explain that non-BMF ships do not fall under our control
If a player from BMF switch to another non-BMF ID'd ship, then the BMF does not have any control on that player
I do not understand why you posting feedback about BAF and Zoners in BMF thread, but seems that you don't listen to the point
You yet complain about gangbang by BMF .... so i stand speechless to nonsense and no reason... and in this case, i ll leave the entire matter for Zak.Conner to argue with you.
I am not a fan or arguments.
While the fact that non-BMF ships are not BFM responsibility is true, if the case clearly states ( I know little about that, just sharing my thoughts regarding member actions ) that BMF members deliberately logged non-BMF ships ( for various resons ) to have the upper hand in the situation, than it is BMF concern, as it can give a bad image of the faction due to the behavour of members.
For example, imagine DSE ships flying around, they get attacked, half of the DSE members log non DSE ships which are more combat efficient just for the sake of greatly overmatching their opponents firepower ... in BHG gunships for example. What does that say about DSE than ?
